2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ipm.2015.02.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Examination of relationships among serendipity, the environment, and individual differences

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
67
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
67
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the system has to apply trial-and-error-and wait-and-see-based behaviours to solve the new problem (Vanderhaegen and Caulier 2011). Serendipity is a conflict of goal that relates to unexpected discovery that demonstrates that the initial baseline is wrong (McCay-Peet et al 2015): what is obtained has nothing to do with what it was expected. Cognitive blindness such as perseveration or the tunnelling effect is a conflict of perception when human experts with high levels of knowledge do not hear alarms even though the latter are functioning correctly (Dehais et al 2012).…”
Section: Taxonomy Of Dissonancesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the system has to apply trial-and-error-and wait-and-see-based behaviours to solve the new problem (Vanderhaegen and Caulier 2011). Serendipity is a conflict of goal that relates to unexpected discovery that demonstrates that the initial baseline is wrong (McCay-Peet et al 2015): what is obtained has nothing to do with what it was expected. Cognitive blindness such as perseveration or the tunnelling effect is a conflict of perception when human experts with high levels of knowledge do not hear alarms even though the latter are functioning correctly (Dehais et al 2012).…”
Section: Taxonomy Of Dissonancesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Serendipity is a positive experience relating to the use of social media, resulting from a dynamic, messy information space that is unpredictable and full of surprises. McCay-Peet et al [38] found that social media environments may be better at leading to the unexpected, a facet of serendipity, than websites, databases, and search engines. Serendipitous experiences are often social in nature, involving a transfer of knowledge or information between people [37], a function for which social media platforms are aptly designed (see uses and gratifications).…”
Section: Serendipitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…She characterised information encountering on social media by identifying six elements of user, motivation, context, information behaviour, information, and information need. More recently, McCay-Peet, Toms, and Kelloway [4] also surveyed 289 professionals, academics, and graduate students to understand whether digital environments have the potential to facilitate information encountering. They found that social media sites support information encountering more than traditional tools such as databases, search engines, or intranets by connecting people to other people with interesting ideas and information.…”
Section: Information Encounteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This also covers mechanisms that enhance the visibility and availability of existing knowledge which then increases the participants' encountering more information. Several authors [12][13][14] also argued that information encountering is not only about finding unexpected information but also about making unexpected connection between different pieces of information, people, ideas, and resources. However, this was out of the focus of this study but could be a theme for future studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%