2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2012.05.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolutionary computation based multi-objective pole shape optimization of switched reluctance machine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to minimize this, a feed forward neural network is trained with distinct set of points in the design field. 145 designs are considered using FEA [28][29][30], to train the neural network [22][23][24][25], for determining the average torque and torque ripple with respect to the geometrical parameters, represented in Fig. 25.…”
Section: Ann Based Performance Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In order to minimize this, a feed forward neural network is trained with distinct set of points in the design field. 145 designs are considered using FEA [28][29][30], to train the neural network [22][23][24][25], for determining the average torque and torque ripple with respect to the geometrical parameters, represented in Fig. 25.…”
Section: Ann Based Performance Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, by the utilization of MOPSO, an attempt has been made to improve the performance of SynRel motor. The search space for the optimization algorithm is established using neural networks [22][23][24][25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the FEM solutions give only part of the information needed to fully describe the performance; this necessitates extensive post processing of the results using specialist software. Lengthy FEM solver based design computations resulted in the previous FEM based Differential Evolution (DE) optimization attempts to be rather restricted in terms of the number of objective function calls, with most such investigations taking more than 10 hours to complete and the number of design points explored being limited to about 200 [11] -with simultaneous three objectives to be optimized this number of design points appears to be insufficient. Furthermore, the same difficulty is encountered with the use of Design of Experiments (DoE) based optimizations as the number of objective function calls based on FEM solver is large even if the number of design objectives is less than 3 [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inherent simplicity, ruggedness and low cost of a SRM make it a viable machine for various general purpose adjustable speed drive applications [1], [2]. It has no permanent magnet (PM) or winding on the rotor.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%