2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.solmat.2016.05.038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolution of oxygenated cadmium sulfide (CdS:O) during high-temperature CdTe solar cell fabrication

Abstract: Oxygenated cadmium sulfide (CdS:O) produced by reactive sputtering has emerged as a promising alternative to conventional CdS for use as the n-type window layer in CdTe solar cells. Here, complementary techniques are used to expose the window layer (CdS or CdS:O) in completed superstrate devices and combined with a suite of materials characterization to elucidate its evolution during high temperature device processing. During device fabrication amorphous CdS:O undergoes significant interdiffusion with CdTe and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The high-resolution core-level XPS (HR-XPS) spectra of CdS, CdS-MHPINS, and CdS-MHP in the Cd 3d region exhibited two well-resolved peaks centered at BE ≈ 404.8 and 411.8 eV assigned to Cd 3d 5/2 and Cd 3d 3/2 peak components of Cd present in +2 oxidation state (Figure b). , The HR-XPS spectra of CdS, CdS-MHPINS, and CdS-MHP in the S 2p region were deconvoluted into three peak components located at 161.5, 162.6, and 168.6 eV (Figure c). The main intense peak at 161.5 eV originated from S 2p 3/2 while the shoulder peak at 162.6 eV was assigned to S 2p 1/2 peak components of sulfur present in the form of sulfides in CdS. , Additionally, a weak peak at 168.6 eV was assigned to sulfates (−SO 4 – ) generated due to the surface oxidation of sulfur present in CdS. , The deconvoluted HR-XPS of bulk C 3 N 5 in the C 1s region gave two peak components at 284.8 and 288.2 eV attributed to sp 3 and sp 2 hybridized carbons, respectively (Figure d) . The presence of adventitious carbons, residual unreacted precursors, and turbostratic carbons was responsible for the sp 3 (C–C) peak, while aromatic carbons (NC–N) constituting heptazine units (C 6 N 7 ) of carbon nitride framework gave rise to the sp 2 carbon peak (Figure d). , After the transformation of C 3 N 5 (MHP) bulk into monolayered sheets, the C 1s binding energies do not change, indicating that the chemical structure of C 3 N 5 remains intact during the transformation of bulk material into nanosheets under harsh acid mediated exfoliation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The high-resolution core-level XPS (HR-XPS) spectra of CdS, CdS-MHPINS, and CdS-MHP in the Cd 3d region exhibited two well-resolved peaks centered at BE ≈ 404.8 and 411.8 eV assigned to Cd 3d 5/2 and Cd 3d 3/2 peak components of Cd present in +2 oxidation state (Figure b). , The HR-XPS spectra of CdS, CdS-MHPINS, and CdS-MHP in the S 2p region were deconvoluted into three peak components located at 161.5, 162.6, and 168.6 eV (Figure c). The main intense peak at 161.5 eV originated from S 2p 3/2 while the shoulder peak at 162.6 eV was assigned to S 2p 1/2 peak components of sulfur present in the form of sulfides in CdS. , Additionally, a weak peak at 168.6 eV was assigned to sulfates (−SO 4 – ) generated due to the surface oxidation of sulfur present in CdS. , The deconvoluted HR-XPS of bulk C 3 N 5 in the C 1s region gave two peak components at 284.8 and 288.2 eV attributed to sp 3 and sp 2 hybridized carbons, respectively (Figure d) . The presence of adventitious carbons, residual unreacted precursors, and turbostratic carbons was responsible for the sp 3 (C–C) peak, while aromatic carbons (NC–N) constituting heptazine units (C 6 N 7 ) of carbon nitride framework gave rise to the sp 2 carbon peak (Figure d). , After the transformation of C 3 N 5 (MHP) bulk into monolayered sheets, the C 1s binding energies do not change, indicating that the chemical structure of C 3 N 5 remains intact during the transformation of bulk material into nanosheets under harsh acid mediated exfoliation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These findings are similar as the sputtered CdS:O layer which has been investigated extensively. [ 18,19 ] In the CdS:O layer, the oxygen is preferred to bond with S to formed SO 2–4 groups, [ 20 ] and the main group is SO 4 which is high resistance and wide bandgap material. [ 21 ] Meanwhile, the grain size of the CdS phase and the crystallinity of the film are decreased.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While for the high temperature annealed CdS:O film, or CdS:O after device fabrication process, its transmittance and bandgap are close to CdS film without oxygen. [ 19,23 ] During annealing process, the phase separation of CdS and CdSO 4 were observed from the transmission electron microscopy (TEM)/energy dispersive X‐ray spectroscopy (EDS) measurements, and the as‐deposited films were changed into double layer. [ 19 ] Therefore, the optical properties of the film are dominated by the CdS layer.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CdTe was deposited in a closed-space sublimation (CSS) system with a source-to-substrate distance of 3 mm and source and substrate temperatures of 660 and 600 °C, respectively. After CdTe deposition, the samples were annealed in the CdCl 2 treatment at 420 °C for 10 min in a separate CSS chamber, 46 and residual CdCl 2 was rinsed off in DI water after the treatment. No other surface treatment was pursued other than water rinsing.…”
Section: Interfacial Chemical Stability: the Interface Betweenmentioning
confidence: 99%