2015
DOI: 10.1007/978-4-431-55480-6_11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolution of Hominid Life History Strategy and Origin of Human Family

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 175 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The social system of early humans remains unclear, but their degree of male philopatry is often considered greater than western gorillas, and possibly as extreme as the Pan species [30,32,8385]. If so, then male philopatry could have been developing in the last common ancestor of Pan and Homo when those taxa diverged, even if it subsequently continued further in Pan (for additional possibilities, see [31,86]).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The social system of early humans remains unclear, but their degree of male philopatry is often considered greater than western gorillas, and possibly as extreme as the Pan species [30,32,8385]. If so, then male philopatry could have been developing in the last common ancestor of Pan and Homo when those taxa diverged, even if it subsequently continued further in Pan (for additional possibilities, see [31,86]).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The infanticide risk hypothesis (infanticide, here, defined as an unrelated male killing a female's offspring) has received support as a primary selection pressure prompting the evolution of pair-bonding in primates (Hawkes, 2004;Opie et al, 2013;Palombit, 1999Palombit, , 2015Smuts, 1992;van Schaik & Dunbar, 1990;van Schaik & Janson, 2000). Risk of infanticide by males among primate species is one of the highest among mammalian species (Hausfater & Hrdy, 1994;Yamagiwa, 2015), thus coinciding with primates' proportionally high rates of pairbonding. Protection against infanticide by year-round association via pair-bonding is one adaptive response against the risk of infanticide (Hawkes, 2004;Opie et al, 2013;Palombit, 1999Palombit, , 2015.…”
Section: Infanticide Risk Hypothesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Protection against infanticide by year-round association via pair-bonding is one adaptive response against the risk of infanticide (Hawkes, 2004;Opie et al, 2013;Palombit, 1999Palombit, , 2015. The crucial factor for infanticide BARBARO -5 of avoidance as a primary selection pressure for pair-bonding in primates appears to be the slow life histories characteristic of primates (Yamagiwa, 2015). Infanticide is more likely to occur in species with slow life histories because of longer nursing times and, in particular, among species characterized by long juvenile periods and long duration of lactation relative to gestation, such as gibbons and humans, for example (Kappeler & van Schaik, 2002).…”
Section: Infanticide Risk Hypothesismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Por otro lado, aunque las estimaciones del gasto energético de la locomoción sin cargas pueden variar de forma notable dependiendo de los valores de la masa corporal empleados, siempre entran dentro del rango de variación de los humanos actuales. Estos resultados demuestran la importancia de la precisión en las estimaciones de la masa corporal en especies fósiles, aspecto fundamental para realizar inferencias sobre muchos otros aspectos de la paleobiología y la paleoecología de los homininos (Leonard y Snodgrass, 2007;Rodríguez-Gómez et al, 2017;Robson y Wood, 2008;Rodríguez et al, 2019;Ruff, 2002;Yamagiwa, 2015). Hasta que no aparezcan nuevos estudios que permitan reducir estos márgenes de error en las estimaciones de la masa corporal, las investigaciones de Bioenergía aplicadas al registro fósil no pueden más que reconocer esta limitación y ser precavidas en las interpretaciones de las comparaciones entre taxones.…”
Section: Limitacionesunclassified