2016
DOI: 10.1098/rsos.160533
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mothers may shape the variations in social organization among gorillas

Abstract: When mothers continue to support their offspring beyond infancy, they can influence the fitness of those offspring, the strength of social relationships within their groups, and the life-history traits of their species. Using up to 30 years of demographic data from 58 groups of gorillas in two study sites, this study extends such findings by showing that mothers may also contribute to differences in social organization between closely related species. Female mountain gorillas remained with their sons for signi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
34
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
(139 reference statements)
1
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, when comparing the influence of the distributions of females on the distribution of males in groups in each gorilla species, it may be insightful to consider only the groups that contain potential male emigrants (i.e., multimale groups), rather than all groups. When considering only multimale groups (and excluding all‐male groups), the number of adult females in multimale groups was 5.3 ± 3.2 for mountain gorillas versus 1.6 ± 0.67 for western gorillas, which is greater than the difference for all groups (previous paragraph) . Thus, when focusing on groups with potential male emigrants (multimale groups), the comparison between gorilla species provides greater support for the hypothesis that the distribution of males is ultimately determined by the distribution of females …”
Section: Hypotheses For Variation In Social Organizationmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Thus, when comparing the influence of the distributions of females on the distribution of males in groups in each gorilla species, it may be insightful to consider only the groups that contain potential male emigrants (i.e., multimale groups), rather than all groups. When considering only multimale groups (and excluding all‐male groups), the number of adult females in multimale groups was 5.3 ± 3.2 for mountain gorillas versus 1.6 ± 0.67 for western gorillas, which is greater than the difference for all groups (previous paragraph) . Thus, when focusing on groups with potential male emigrants (multimale groups), the comparison between gorilla species provides greater support for the hypothesis that the distribution of males is ultimately determined by the distribution of females …”
Section: Hypotheses For Variation In Social Organizationmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…The lack of immigration means that male philopatry is the primary proximate reason for the occurrence of multimale groups. In other words, multimale groups are rare among western gorillas because all of the subordinate males disperse as they reach adulthood …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Automated identification software could assist the manual identification process. Particularly, since group stability of western gorillas is low, individuals transfer between groups regularly, groups are formed or dissolved, and groups or individuals may immigrate in, or emigrate out of the bai population [72,57,62]. When unknown individuals appear in the bai, it can be challenging to establish with certainty if they are truly new to the population or if they were already known to prior research teams [5].…”
Section: New Research Horizonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The probability of male emigration does not appear to be influenced by the number of potential mates in the group, the number of potential competitors, or the age of dominant male (Stoinski et al 2009a; Watts 2000). Instead, mating opportunities and the presence of mothers may lead to male philopatry (Robbins et al 2016; Stoinski et al 2009a, b).
Fig.
…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%