Evolution of hair transplantation

Abstract

Aim: Numerous non-surgical methods and surgical options are available for the solution of baldness in the practice. Technology provides mighty weapons in this field. Thus, individualized solutions are best carried out with well-trained and qualified practitioners. Here, a modification of follicular unit extraction, direct hair implantation is introduced with previously licensed unique pens. Methods: Follicular unit extraction and direct hair implantation methods were carried out in 207 hair transplantations between January and December of 2014. The nests for the grafts were created via pieces of hand-cut razor blade in follicular unit extraction. In addition, a new modification of follicular unit extraction, direct hair implantation, is done via pens that are produced for this purpose. Results: Thirty-eight direct hair implantations were performed in addition with 169 follicular unit extractions. An average number of 2973 grafts were transplanted. Mean operation time was calculated as 385 min. Conclusion: Hair transplantation is still the best solution for hair loss. In conjunction with the surgery, the addition of non-surgical interventions may give a better result to the patient. On the other hand, the promising results in the field of regenerative medicine with cell-based solutions may alter hair transplantation and change the options solely into this field.

Adjuvant measures and genetic evaluations to improve results of hair transplantation

“…Male type baldness harms an individual's selfesteem and emotional well-being. Hair transplantation gives a permanent solution for those patients (20,21). Hair transplantation is a relatively new and continuously evolving art, with several new advances, leading to more natural results for patients (22)(23)(24).…”

Keloid scars arising after follicular unit extraction hair transplantation

“…However, it requires excellent hand-eye coordination, physical stamina, and a longer learning curve. [ 9 ]…”

Treatment options for androgenetic alopecia: Efficacy, side effects, compliance, financial considerations, and ethics

“…Although the process is monitored by the operator, it rarely requires override or correction. In a study of 38 consecutive robotic FUE procedures, the transection rate was comparable to the ellipse procedure when performed by an experienced transplant team, both around 5–7% 173 . Robotics also has the capability to create recipient sites and replace hairs.…”

“…In a study of 38 consecutive robotic FUE procedures, the transection rate was comparable to the ellipse procedure when performed by an experienced transplant team, both around 5–7%. 173 Robotics also has the capability to create recipient sites and replace hairs. Disadvantages of robotic FUE include high cost, maintenance, office space, and need to trim a wider donor region in order to harvest follicular groupings.…”