Evolution and Accuracy of Surface Humidity Reports*

Abstract

Until recently surface humidity was predominantly measured using psychrometers (wet-and dry-bulb thermometers). In some countries, often in conjunction with increased automation, the measurement technique has changed-usually to capacitive sensors. The scale of the change in instrumentation and the error characteristics of the operational instruments have not been well documented. This paper provides an overview of these operational instruments and their error characteristics, intended to be useful for climate and forecast users of the data. It also includes detailed results from comparisons of psychrometers and capacitive sensors with a chilled mirror reference instrument at a site in the United Kingdom under (near) operational conditions. The psychrometers performed well near saturation but underread at lower humidities; any large errors tended to be positive because of insufficient water supply to the wet bulb. New capacitive sensors perform well but they usually drift to higher values during deployment (except in arid climates); they perform best at lower humidities and need regular adjustment and recalibration. The natural variation of relative humidity and the differences between instruments are larger in daytime than at night. Changes in the U.K. synoptic network are described in order to put the intercomparisons into context. The instruments used in selected other countries are surveyed. There is a need for better documentation and real-time exchange of metadata on the instruments used and any changes. Capacitive sensors are also used on some radiosondes and aircraft; relevant studies are briefly reviewed and some parallels with surface usage are drawn.

New Setup of the UAS ALADINA for Measuring Boundary Layer Properties, Atmospheric Particles and Solar Radiation

“…One is of the type HMP110 (Vaisala, Vantaa, Finland), which is commonly used [41] and often referred to, and a sensing element Rapid P14 (Innovative Sensor Technology, Ebnat-Kappel, Switzerland).…”

How good are citizen weather stations? Addressing a biased opinion

“…In a separate field study, Ingleby et al . () found that Rotronics Hydroclip sensors tend to drift by +1% to +2% per year at Met Office sites (although there is a lot of variability) and can be slow to recover from periods stuck at saturation. They estimate that an uncertainty of 2–3% for an operational Rotronics Hydroclip is achievable under best conditions.…”

The state of automated amateur weather observations

“…Over time they can ‘drift’, especially when exposed to long periods of high humidity, and they have a tendency to read higher (and thus ‘wetter’) by around 1–2% per year (Visscher and Kornet, ). This problem of drift is not isolated to amateur sensors; it occurs in professional systems as well (Ingleby et al ., ), the difference being that professional stations are regularly subject to recalibration using specialised equipment, which is rarely available to amateurs. Even a simple zero‐check for thermometers in iced water proves difficult, as many of the thermometers used in automated amateur weather stations are mounted on a circuit board, which can easily be damaged when submerged in water.…”