Until recently surface humidity was predominantly measured using psychrometers (wet-and dry-bulb thermometers). In some countries, often in conjunction with increased automation, the measurement technique has changed-usually to capacitive sensors. The scale of the change in instrumentation and the error characteristics of the operational instruments have not been well documented. This paper provides an overview of these operational instruments and their error characteristics, intended to be useful for climate and forecast users of the data. It also includes detailed results from comparisons of psychrometers and capacitive sensors with a chilled mirror reference instrument at a site in the United Kingdom under (near) operational conditions. The psychrometers performed well near saturation but underread at lower humidities; any large errors tended to be positive because of insufficient water supply to the wet bulb. New capacitive sensors perform well but they usually drift to higher values during deployment (except in arid climates); they perform best at lower humidities and need regular adjustment and recalibration. The natural variation of relative humidity and the differences between instruments are larger in daytime than at night. Changes in the U.K. synoptic network are described in order to put the intercomparisons into context. The instruments used in selected other countries are surveyed. There is a need for better documentation and real-time exchange of metadata on the instruments used and any changes. Capacitive sensors are also used on some radiosondes and aircraft; relevant studies are briefly reviewed and some parallels with surface usage are drawn.
Results of a side-by-side comparison of wind speed, as measured by three Met Office observing systems, are presented. Mean wind speeds as measured by each system differed by <1.0 knots (0.5 m s −1 ) at wind speeds of up to 30 knots (15.4 m s −1 ). Although differences increased slightly with increasing wind speed, they remained within user-specified accuracy limits over the whole range of wind speeds experienced. The trial set-up involved the mounting of anemometers on a single mast. Although a slight sheltering of anemometers occurred at given wind directions, the effect on the overall wind speed differences was negligible.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.