2015
DOI: 10.1002/wea.2316
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How good are citizen weather stations? Addressing a biased opinion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
118
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(125 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
6
118
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is therefore considered to be a passive crowdsourcing method (Muller et al , ). While there are a large number of similar citizen science weather stations available (Bell et al , , ), none have proven to be as prolific in adoption as the Netatmo, particularly in urban settings.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is therefore considered to be a passive crowdsourcing method (Muller et al , ). While there are a large number of similar citizen science weather stations available (Bell et al , , ), none have proven to be as prolific in adoption as the Netatmo, particularly in urban settings.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A growing number of weather enthusiasts measure their local weather with automatic personal weather stations (PWSs). PWS accuracy on measuring temperature, relative humidity, radiation, pressure, rainfall, wind speed and direction has been evaluated for popular high-end expensive weather stations (Jenkins, 2014;Bell et al, 2015), as well as for the cheaper, user-friendly Netatmo type (temperature only) (Meier et al, 2015), which have grown rapidly in number over the past years. So far, weather stations have been used to obtain air temperature data to examine the urban heat island effect (Steeneveld et al, 2011;Wolters and Brandsma, 2012), although other meteorological variables, such as rainfall, are measured by some of these stations as well.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effectiveness of the radiation shield was tested against a Bureau of Meteorology weather station at half‐hourly resolution at the Adelaide Airport, leading to a correlation coefficient of 0.997 and root‐mean‐squared difference of 0.24°C. This degree of accuracy is comparable to, or better than, commercially available radiation shields [ Bell et al , ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 72%