2021
DOI: 10.1080/01462679.2021.1971588
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

“Evidence of Me” Becoming “Evidence of Us”: A Case Study of the Policy, Processes, Donor Relations and Responses of Selected New Zealand GLAM Institutions to Personal Donations of Collections and Artifacts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

3
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, as with prior works we saw that, while sharing some challenges, artists and writers also display 'the unique documentary patterns of individuals and the expressions of an individual's character and interior struggles' [42,51]. Such uniqueness poses a challenge to the traditional approaches to acquisition and appraisal methods used by heritage institutions, as has been noted in literature discussing models and challenges of donation processes [51][52][53][54], and may therefore create tensions between individual and organisational practices [28,53,55]. As this research showed, the logic and transparency of individuals' organisation practices (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…However, as with prior works we saw that, while sharing some challenges, artists and writers also display 'the unique documentary patterns of individuals and the expressions of an individual's character and interior struggles' [42,51]. Such uniqueness poses a challenge to the traditional approaches to acquisition and appraisal methods used by heritage institutions, as has been noted in literature discussing models and challenges of donation processes [51][52][53][54], and may therefore create tensions between individual and organisational practices [28,53,55]. As this research showed, the logic and transparency of individuals' organisation practices (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Czerwinski et al, 2006; Kaye et al, 2006; Marshall, 2007). Yet personal collections often serve as evidence of a person's life when they are gone (Day & Krtalić, 2022; Kim, 2013) and later generations use them to, e.g. “envision the lives of their ancestors” (Kim, 2013, p.156) or examine the endurance of deceased cultural figures (Schott, 2019).…”
Section: Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another defining feature of life, in all societies and times, is death. Death is inevitable and ever approaching, and thus motivates, subtly or otherwise, much of life and of information activities: its approach often implies a need for individuals to prepare to transfer important information to family (Krtalić et al, 2021) and for institutions to ensure continued access across generations (Borgman, 2003), and its eventual arrival (or sudden occurrence) often requires a response, like when a donation is unexpectedly bequeathed (Beck, 2014; Day & Krtalić, 2022), or more commonly, must simply be accessed or evaluated and then sold or disposed of (Krtalić et al, 2021; Leaver, 2013). The digital transformation of society and industries continues today, and the norm therein is to accumulate digital information without explicit planning for what happens with/to it at the end of life (Dinneen, 2022; Hellmich & Dinneen, 2022; Krtalić et al, 2021); put simply, a growing proportion of the world are accumulating collections and then dying.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%