2007
DOI: 10.1258/095646207780658854
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence for the effectiveness of a chlamydia awareness campaign: increased population rates of chlamydia testing and detection

Abstract: The objective of this study was to determine the effectiveness of a statewide campaign aimed at increasing chlamydia awareness and testing among younger people. In November 2002, a narrowcast media campaign targeting men and women aged 16-29 years was launched in Victoria, Australia. This was expanded in June 2003. Data on chlamydia testing via Medicare and chlamydia notifications, before and after the campaign, were compared to determine possible effects of the campaign on population rates of chlamydia testin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reasons for the overall decline in screening rates in the study are uncertain; however, they highlight the fact that screening rates may be influenced or indeed driven by external factors. For instance, overall screening rates for chlamydia may be influenced by how aware clinicians and members of the public are for the need for STI screening [15]. They are also likely to be influenced by the characteristics of the health systems in which screening is undertaken, not least by the access to screening available to people at risk for infection and by factors that affect the level of access [9].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reasons for the overall decline in screening rates in the study are uncertain; however, they highlight the fact that screening rates may be influenced or indeed driven by external factors. For instance, overall screening rates for chlamydia may be influenced by how aware clinicians and members of the public are for the need for STI screening [15]. They are also likely to be influenced by the characteristics of the health systems in which screening is undertaken, not least by the access to screening available to people at risk for infection and by factors that affect the level of access [9].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on previous research, we expected that half of the participants in the intervention group would order the kit and at least 30% would send it back,15 and a 25% attrition rate and a 2% testing rate in the control group 16 17. To detect at least a 1% difference in the testing rate in the intervention versus control group with a power of 90% and p<0.05, we needed 5118 participants in each group 18.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of these 37 articles, 17 papers in primary care or hospital settings were excluded. However, two programmes which offered a choice of clinic or community‐based screening were included . A final total of 20 papers were included in the systematic review.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%