2017
DOI: 10.1136/sextrans-2015-052510
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chlamyweb Study II: a randomised controlled trial (RCT) of an online offer of home-basedChlamydia trachomatissampling in France

Abstract: AFFSAPS n° IDRCB 0211-A01000-41; Results.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
49
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
6
49
2
Order By: Relevance
“… 9 In France, an RCT investigating an intervention to encourage chlamydia testing via an online service on uptake of testing suggested the intervention had a greater effect on men, though no other differences in the uptake between groups were observed. 23 However, this may be subject to bias due to low follow-up (30%). 23 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 9 In France, an RCT investigating an intervention to encourage chlamydia testing via an online service on uptake of testing suggested the intervention had a greater effect on men, though no other differences in the uptake between groups were observed. 23 However, this may be subject to bias due to low follow-up (30%). 23 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It reports an increase in testing uptake (29.2% in the intervention group versus 8.7% in the control group, RR 3.37, 95% CI 3.05 to 3.74). However, outcomes were assessed using different measures in the intervention and control groups, and there was low and differential follow-up (47% follow-up in the intervention group versus 30% follow-up in the control group) [ 45 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there is increasing availability of internet-based ordering of STI tests in developed countries, such services are highly heterogeneous: some are targeted to specific risk groups (based on age, ethnicity, or sexual orientation), test for a single infection [ 10 ], may be fully integrated with existing health services [ 11 ] or completely independent. A randomized controlled trial in France reported an increase in testing uptake (29.2% in the intervention group vs 8.7% in the control group, risk ratio: 3.37, 95% CI 3.05-3.74) [ 12 ]. However, outcomes were assessed using different measures in the intervention and control group, and there was low follow-up [ 12 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%