1997
DOI: 10.1006/anbe.1996.0416
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence for an important social role of allogrooming in a platyrrhine primate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

9
100
0
32

Year Published

2000
2000
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 128 publications
(141 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
9
100
0
32
Order By: Relevance
“…by-product mutualism [84]). Similarly, among tufted capuchin monkeys, dominant males are the preferred sociosexual partner [62,76,85,86]; yet, despite these asymmetric benefits to male reproductive success, no rank effects are apparent. High levels of participation by subordinate males may nevertheless be maintained if resident males gain benefits through inclusive fitness [87] or through reproductive queuing and delayed reciprocity (cf.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…by-product mutualism [84]). Similarly, among tufted capuchin monkeys, dominant males are the preferred sociosexual partner [62,76,85,86]; yet, despite these asymmetric benefits to male reproductive success, no rank effects are apparent. High levels of participation by subordinate males may nevertheless be maintained if resident males gain benefits through inclusive fitness [87] or through reproductive queuing and delayed reciprocity (cf.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, unlike some primates (Cheney 1977;de Waal 1989), grooming for meerkats did not mediate access to resources. Instead, changes in grooming prompted changes in non-resource-focused antagonism, which, as in primates (DiBitetti 1997;Schino 2001), relate to social status (Kutsukake & Clutton-Brock 2006a). These dominance interactions are crucial in shaping the social structure of meerkat groups (Clutton-Brock et al 2001;Griffin et al 2003;Kutsukake & Clutton-Brock 2006b;Young et al 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Há duas possibilidades de hipóteses sobre a função da catação: uma determina que tenha como função a higiene do pelo (Hutchins & Barash, 1976); enquanto a outra afirma que representa uma função social, como forma de estabelecer e manter relações dentro do grupo (Stammbach & Kummer, 1982), assim como reduzir as tensões sociais (Boccia, 1987, Schino et al, 1988. Di Bitetti (1997) verificou que os pares de indivíduos que realizam catação com maior frequência são os mesmos que formam alianças mais fortes. Alguns estudos realizados com Cebus capucinus relataram que as fêmeas dominantes recebem a maior parte das catações (Perry et al, 2017, Rose, 1998 catações com maior frequência nas fêmeas subordinadas do que o inverso (Parr et al, 1997).…”
Section: Vida Socialunclassified