1961
DOI: 10.3181/00379727-106-26492
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence for a Central Mechanism in Angiotensin Induced Hypertension.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
119
2
2

Year Published

1966
1966
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 342 publications
(124 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
119
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the pressor potency was reduced by treatment with the catecholamine depleting substances, reserpine and syrosingopine, and was restored by infusions of catecholamines. Similarly, inhibition of monoamine oxidase which has been shown to increase peripheral levels of catecholamines (Goldberg & Shideman, 1962;Sanan & Vogt, 1962) (Feldberg & Lewis, 1964, 1965Vane, 1969 (Bickerton & Buckley, 1961) and via central vagal inhibition (Scroop & Lowe, 1968). The failure of both pempidine and bethanidine to reduce the angiotensin pressor responses in the present experiments argues against a significant central component to the response.…”
contrasting
confidence: 38%
“…Thus, the pressor potency was reduced by treatment with the catecholamine depleting substances, reserpine and syrosingopine, and was restored by infusions of catecholamines. Similarly, inhibition of monoamine oxidase which has been shown to increase peripheral levels of catecholamines (Goldberg & Shideman, 1962;Sanan & Vogt, 1962) (Feldberg & Lewis, 1964, 1965Vane, 1969 (Bickerton & Buckley, 1961) and via central vagal inhibition (Scroop & Lowe, 1968). The failure of both pempidine and bethanidine to reduce the angiotensin pressor responses in the present experiments argues against a significant central component to the response.…”
contrasting
confidence: 38%
“…Though it is generally assumed that the pressor effect of angiotensin is due to a direct stimulation of vascula~r smooth muscle, a number of recent studies strongly suggest a nerve-mediated component of action (Bickerton & Buckley, 1961;Laverty, 1963). The reduction of the pressor effect of angiotensin by guanethidine might be related to the adrenergic nerve blocking action of the latter.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Somlyo et al (1965) also observed slight or no response of the umbilical vessels to angiotensin. The polypeptide is a powerful vasoconstrictor, and the bulk of evidence to date suggests a strong direct musculotropic action in causing this effect, though a nerve mediated component of action has been demonstrated (Bickerton & Buckley, 1961;Laverty, 1963;Robertson & Rubin, 1962). The inactivity of angiotensin is probably due to absence of responsive sites in the umbilical artery for angiotensin.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%