1967
DOI: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1967.tb02151.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Supersensitivity to Catecholamines Following Guanethidine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1973
1973
1980
1980

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bearing in mind the probable site of action of these two agents, it is possible that the circular muscle is not as richly innervated as the longitudinal with noradrenergic nerves. Holman & McLean (1967) found that contractions of the longitudinal muscle in sheep mesenteric vein to acetylcholine were abolished by phentolamine and atropine. We found phentolamine did not block the response to acetylcholine which was, however, completely abolished by atropine.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Bearing in mind the probable site of action of these two agents, it is possible that the circular muscle is not as richly innervated as the longitudinal with noradrenergic nerves. Holman & McLean (1967) found that contractions of the longitudinal muscle in sheep mesenteric vein to acetylcholine were abolished by phentolamine and atropine. We found phentolamine did not block the response to acetylcholine which was, however, completely abolished by atropine.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Application of Student's t-test has shown this potentiation of the longitudinal muscle by cocaine to be significantly greater than that of the circular muscle (P < 0.05). Gokhale, Gulati & Kelkar (1967). In five veins pretreated with guanethidine (3 x 1 0 -5~) the responses of both the longitudinal and circular muscle to noradrenaline were potentiated ( Table 2).…”
Section: Cocainementioning
confidence: 90%