“…In recent years, social movement scholars have shown increasing interest in the internal lives of social movements and what we might call the "backstage" of protest. They investigated questions of internal democracy and democratic practices (Della Porta, 2009b;Graeber, 2009;Leach, 2009;Maeckelbergh, 2009;Polletta, 2002), consensus decision-making (Haug, 2011;Della Porta, 2009a), deliberation (Della Porta, 2005), multi-lingual communication and translation (Doerr, 2009), the role of online and offline communication (Kavada, 2010), various dimensions of social movement culture (Hart, 2001;Summers-Effler, 2010), the interactive formation of collective identity (Flesher Fominaya, 2010), practices of network organizing (Juris, 2008(Juris, , 2012Maiba, 2005), tensions between different approaches to political practice (Flesher Fominaya, 2007, in press;Pleyers, 2010) and the related politics of organization (Böhm, Sullivan, & Reyes, 2005), the role of everyday routines (Glass, 2010), social movement scenes (Haunss & Leach, 2007), and the creation of public spheres within movements (Doerr, 2010;Haug, 2010b). Rather than studying the "frontstage" of protest where social movements appear to the general public as more or less homogenous actors with a given goal and strategy, these studies attend to social movements as action contexts or collective spaces in which activists find themselves and which they aim to shape and organize according to their needs and visions.…”