2010
DOI: 10.17813/maiq.15.2.ah34865736071251
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Everyday Routines in Free Spaces: Explaining the Persistence of The Zapatistas in Los Angeles

Abstract: While examining the radical potential of "free spaces"—small-scale, grassroots sites for social movements—researchers neglect the daily activities underlying their continued existence. Based on participant observation at Zapatista community centers in Los Angeles, this article argues that everyday routines are important for the persistence of free spaces. Participants spent the majority of their time involved in routines. These were repetitive tasks for maintaining the organization; their focus was practical a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In recent years, social movement scholars have shown increasing interest in the internal lives of social movements and what we might call the "backstage" of protest. They investigated questions of internal democracy and democratic practices (Della Porta, 2009b;Graeber, 2009;Leach, 2009;Maeckelbergh, 2009;Polletta, 2002), consensus decision-making (Haug, 2011;Della Porta, 2009a), deliberation (Della Porta, 2005), multi-lingual communication and translation (Doerr, 2009), the role of online and offline communication (Kavada, 2010), various dimensions of social movement culture (Hart, 2001;Summers-Effler, 2010), the interactive formation of collective identity (Flesher Fominaya, 2010), practices of network organizing (Juris, 2008(Juris, , 2012Maiba, 2005), tensions between different approaches to political practice (Flesher Fominaya, 2007, in press;Pleyers, 2010) and the related politics of organization (Böhm, Sullivan, & Reyes, 2005), the role of everyday routines (Glass, 2010), social movement scenes (Haunss & Leach, 2007), and the creation of public spheres within movements (Doerr, 2010;Haug, 2010b). Rather than studying the "frontstage" of protest where social movements appear to the general public as more or less homogenous actors with a given goal and strategy, these studies attend to social movements as action contexts or collective spaces in which activists find themselves and which they aim to shape and organize according to their needs and visions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, social movement scholars have shown increasing interest in the internal lives of social movements and what we might call the "backstage" of protest. They investigated questions of internal democracy and democratic practices (Della Porta, 2009b;Graeber, 2009;Leach, 2009;Maeckelbergh, 2009;Polletta, 2002), consensus decision-making (Haug, 2011;Della Porta, 2009a), deliberation (Della Porta, 2005), multi-lingual communication and translation (Doerr, 2009), the role of online and offline communication (Kavada, 2010), various dimensions of social movement culture (Hart, 2001;Summers-Effler, 2010), the interactive formation of collective identity (Flesher Fominaya, 2010), practices of network organizing (Juris, 2008(Juris, , 2012Maiba, 2005), tensions between different approaches to political practice (Flesher Fominaya, 2007, in press;Pleyers, 2010) and the related politics of organization (Böhm, Sullivan, & Reyes, 2005), the role of everyday routines (Glass, 2010), social movement scenes (Haunss & Leach, 2007), and the creation of public spheres within movements (Doerr, 2010;Haug, 2010b). Rather than studying the "frontstage" of protest where social movements appear to the general public as more or less homogenous actors with a given goal and strategy, these studies attend to social movements as action contexts or collective spaces in which activists find themselves and which they aim to shape and organize according to their needs and visions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Los estudiosos del movimiento social recién empezaron a mostrar más interés en las organizaciones de los movimientos sociales. Los principales temas de investigación han sido las estructuras internas y los procesos de decisiones (Della Porta et al, 2009;Leach, 2009;Kreiss, 2014;Polletta, 2002;Maeckelbergh, 2012;Choi-Fitzpatrick, 2014;Polletta, 2005), liderazgo y jerarquía (Milam y Heath, 2014;Sutherland et al, 2013;Spicer y Böhm, 2007;Briscoe y Safford, 2008;Western, 2014), conflictos (Laamanen y den Hond, 2015; Maeckelbergh, 2012), y las rutinas cotidianas (Glass, 2010;Tilly, 1995). Las contribuciones relacionadas con la teoría organizacional suelen referirse al concepto de organizaciones prefigurativas.…”
Section: Las Oms En La Teoría Organizacionalunclassified
“…Complementing this, work on social movement spaces shows how movements ‘prefigure’ movement goals in everyday practices (see Polletta ). Yet similarly to arguments about abeyance, the emphasis is on the role that spaces and visions of ‘alternatives’ have in social movement ‘persistence’, as though they were important to movements only during periods of quiescence (Polletta ; Futrell and Simi ; Glass ). Work on prefiguration, particularly in studies of the alter‐globalization movement, shows that the way in which political action is planned and undertaken, even in everyday life, is important both in producing inspiring and/or feasible alternative societies, and in distinguishing groups from authoritarian and hierarchical forms of left‐wing political organization (Graeber ; Maeckelbergh ).…”
Section: Perspectives On Everyday Life and Political Protestmentioning
confidence: 99%