2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.tourman.2010.03.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Event segmentation: A review and research agenda

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
73
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 119 publications
1
73
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, most of the segment bases used in tourism related research are a combination of sociodemographic and behavioural variables, as shown in Figure 1 (Kruger & Saayman, 2010:94). A review of 120 research papers by Tkaczynski and Rundle-Thiele (2011) confirms this notion. In tourism literature aspects such as behaviour, patterns, motivation and benefits sought of nature-based/ national park tourists, and their interrelation have not been considered in great detail (Kruger & Saayman, 2010:94;Park & Yoon, 2009:100).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…However, most of the segment bases used in tourism related research are a combination of sociodemographic and behavioural variables, as shown in Figure 1 (Kruger & Saayman, 2010:94). A review of 120 research papers by Tkaczynski and Rundle-Thiele (2011) confirms this notion. In tourism literature aspects such as behaviour, patterns, motivation and benefits sought of nature-based/ national park tourists, and their interrelation have not been considered in great detail (Kruger & Saayman, 2010:94;Park & Yoon, 2009:100).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…This review concluded that a multiple segmentation base approach (e.g., a combination of demographic, psychographics, and behavioral patterns) was most frequently utilized within academia to segment visitors to events. As visitors with similar demographics may have very different psychographic profiles (e.g., Moscardo et al, 2001;Poria, Biran, & Reichel, 2007) and/or behavioral patterns (e.g., Frochot & Morrison, 2000;Hsu & Lee, 2002), the authors argued that a multiple segmentation base approach is warranted to provide a more representative view of a diverse and heterogeneous group of potential visitors (Tkaczynski & Rundle-Thiele, 2011). This recommendation is in line with Bowen and Daniels (2005) who argued that festival organizers need to utilize different marketing tactics to broaden a music festival's appeal as it is perilous to rely on only music to drive visitation.…”
Section: Music Tourism and Market Segmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since each method conducts a multivariate description of the data, grouping units based on their similarity, "different methods present different views of data" (Leisch, 2006). Unfortunately, as emphasized by many researchers, no absolutely "correct" method to segment exists in the literature (Beane & Ennis, 1987;Dolnicar et al, 2008;Kotler et al, 2010;Tkaczynski & Rundle-Thiele, 2011), since the underlying relationships among units have different structures, depending on data at hand, and the researcher must find the best segmentation method to capture this hidden structure. In addition, the researcher intervenes in different moments of the estimation process, "creating" an ever increasing number of new segmentation methods and giving subjective interpretations of the final results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%