2003
DOI: 10.1109/mnet.2003.1233916
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of transport protocols for the session initiation protocol

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(15 reference statements)
0
34
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Another feature, multi-streaming, can minimize head-ofline (HOL) blocking, as evaluated by Camarillo, Kantola and Schulzrinne [4]. The HOL blocking occurs in TCP when a segment is lost and a subsequent segment arrives out of order.…”
Section: B Features Improving Server Scalabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another feature, multi-streaming, can minimize head-ofline (HOL) blocking, as evaluated by Camarillo, Kantola and Schulzrinne [4]. The HOL blocking occurs in TCP when a segment is lost and a subsequent segment arrives out of order.…”
Section: B Features Improving Server Scalabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We summarize some of these benefits here and analyze how they relate to SIP (a more detailed analysis can be found in [12]). …”
Section: Potential Benefitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3][4] provides a comparison of call setup in SIP on top of UDP, TCP, and stream control transmission protocol (SCTP) using ns-2. SIP call setup time and RTP one-way delay have been evaluated using IPv4, IPv6 and different IPv4-IPv6 transitioning mechanisms [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%