2012
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.11.7000
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Tissue Sampling Methods Used for MRI-Detected Contralateral Breast Lesions in the American College of Radiology Imaging Network 6667 Trial

Abstract: OBJECTIVE The purpose of our study was to evaluate tissue sampling methods used for MRI-detected suspicious contralateral breast lesions in the American College of Radiology Imaging Network (ACRIN) 6667 trial. MATERIALS AND METHODS Breast MRI was performed at 25 institutions in 969 women who had a recent diagnosis of unilateral breast cancer and negative contralateral mammography and clinical breast examinations. Biopsy was recommended for MRI findings in 135 women, and 121 underwent sampling. Frequencies an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An extra biopsy was performed in 50% of them. Many contralateral surgeries and mastectomies could have been avoided if a needle biopsy had been performed before the surgery [ 16 ]. The percentages revealed by this study are in agreement with the results of other recent studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An extra biopsy was performed in 50% of them. Many contralateral surgeries and mastectomies could have been avoided if a needle biopsy had been performed before the surgery [ 16 ]. The percentages revealed by this study are in agreement with the results of other recent studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This trial was a multi-institutional study including 25 academic and private practice sites with international representation and 50 total readers (22)(23)(24)(25). The data for …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Guidance on the performance of CE-MRI and biopsies by the Canadian Association of Radiologists [16], ACR [15,[69][70][71][72][73][74][75][76][77][78][79], EUSOBI [13,80], and others may be useful; however, these were not critically reviewed or compared in this evidence summary. Several studies used technical standards for MRI set by the American College of Radiology Imaging Network (ACRIN) 6667 trial [81][82][83][84] and EUSOBI, as well as the ACRIN 6698 trial for DWI [85].…”
Section: Technical Factors For Mri Usementioning
confidence: 99%