ObjectiveTo assess the role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the planning of
breast cancer treatment strategies.Materials and MethodsThe study included 160 women diagnosed with breast cancer, who underwent
breast MRI for preoperative staging. Using Pearson's correlation coefficient
(r), we compared the size of the primary tumor, as
determined by MRI, by conventional imaging (mammography and ultrasound), and
in the pathological examination (gold standard). The identification of
lesions not identified in previous examinations was also evaluated, as was
its influence on treatment planning.ResultsThe mean age of the patients was 52.2 years (range, 30–81 years), and the
most common histological type was invasive ductal carcinoma (in 60.6% of the
patients). In terms of the tumor size determined, MRI correlated better with
the pathological examination than did mammography (r =
0.872 vs. 0.710) or ultrasound (r = 0.836 vs. 0.704). MRI
identified additional lesions in 53 patients (33.1%), including malignant
lesions in 20 (12.5%), which led to change in the therapeutic planning in 23
patients (14.4%).ConclusionBreast MRI proved to be more accurate than conventional imaging in
determining the dimensions of the main tumor and was able to identify
lesions not identified by other methods evaluated, which altered the
therapeutic planning in a significant proportion of cases.