2013
DOI: 10.11144/javeriana.sc18-2.etmp
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of three methods for preservation of Azotobacter: freeze-drying, cryopreservation, and immobilization in dry polymers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…0025, agar 15) for 48 h at 30 ºC. The concentrations of carrageenin and alginate were selected according to Rojas-Tapias et al (2013), and the concentration of HPMC was based on previous experiments in our lab (data not shown). Sodium alginate and carrageenin were purchased from FMC BioPolymers (Ewing, USA), and HPMC from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, USA).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…0025, agar 15) for 48 h at 30 ºC. The concentrations of carrageenin and alginate were selected according to Rojas-Tapias et al (2013), and the concentration of HPMC was based on previous experiments in our lab (data not shown). Sodium alginate and carrageenin were purchased from FMC BioPolymers (Ewing, USA), and HPMC from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, USA).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We previously studied the preservation of A. chroococcum C26 in dry polymers, and observed that alginate and carrageenin are suitable polymers to maintain the viability and activity of A. chroococcum C26 at room temperature (Rojas-Tapias et al 2013). In this study, our objective was to perform a thermodynamic analysis to determine the efficiency of alginate, carrageenin, and a new polymer (HPMC) to maintain the viability of C26, select the best polymer in basis on the Arrhenius equation and its activation energy, and predict the viability of C26 cells in each polymer throughout the time using the Arrhenius plot.…”
Section: Preservation Of Azotobacter Chroococcum Vegetative Cells In mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and Azotobacter sp. Azotobacter has significant roles in availability of some nutritions like Nitrogen, Phosphorus, Sulphur and carbon via boosting mineralization of organic residues (Fekete et al, 1989;Levaiet al, 2008;Rojas-Tapias et al, 2013).Azotobacter genus belongs to the γ-subclass of the Proeobacteria (Tchan and New, 1984;Becking, 2004) which constitutes seven species namely, A. chroococcum, A. vinelandii, A. beijerinckii, A. paspali, A. armeniacus, A. nigricans, and A. salinestri (Jimenez et al, 2011). A. chroococcum is the most inhabitingvarious soils (Balandreau, 1986;Tchan and New, 1984;Dobereiner, 1995;Martyniuk and Martyniuk, 2003).…”
Section: Azotobactermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of non-leguminous plants, there is no symbiotic relation, therefore the plant is inoculate with free-living N2 fixing bacteria, such as Azotobacter and Azospirillium. These were inoculated in patula pine (Orozco & Martínez, 2009), pastures (Garrido et al 2010, Cárdenas et al 2010, Cárdenas et al 2014), stevia (Borda et al 2011), vegetables (Jiménez et al 2011, eucalyptus (Obando et al 2010, Rojas et al 2013, and maize (Rojas et al 2012). In high efficiency plants having photosynthesis (C4 plants) sugar cane and corn, successful results have been obtained when inoculated into the rhizosphere.…”
Section: Analysis Of Co-occurrencementioning
confidence: 99%