2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2015.12.085
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the matrix effect on gas chromatography – mass spectrometry with carrier gas containing ethylene glycol as an analyte protectant

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In complex matrices, components within the matrix can affect the interaction between the analyte and the active sites of the column. 63 With continuous testing, this effect can be exacerbated because of the formation of new active sites by the accumulation of low-volatile matrix components. 63 After the SPE procedure, CAT was not identified in any of the samples, as evidenced in Figure 4d.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In complex matrices, components within the matrix can affect the interaction between the analyte and the active sites of the column. 63 With continuous testing, this effect can be exacerbated because of the formation of new active sites by the accumulation of low-volatile matrix components. 63 After the SPE procedure, CAT was not identified in any of the samples, as evidenced in Figure 4d.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…63 With continuous testing, this effect can be exacerbated because of the formation of new active sites by the accumulation of low-volatile matrix components. 63 After the SPE procedure, CAT was not identified in any of the samples, as evidenced in Figure 4d. If trace amounts of CAT were present on the flowthrough from the SPE, the concentration of these samples is very low and outside of the limit of detection of the instrument.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The optimized method is reliable for the simultaneous detection of 43 pesticide residues in Schizonepeta tenuifolia . On the other hand, regarding the problem of the low recovery rate of Chlorothalonil, Thiamethoxam, and Dicofol, with no obvious experimental evidences obtained to explain the phenomenon, some instrumental condition variations, analytical error, decomposition of target in blank extract, and any other mechanisms were believed to be linked [ 27 , 28 ]. The other ways should be investigated to improve the recovery of them in our future work.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additional information, such as clustering of fragments across multiple samples can be used to identify highly correlated fragments based on peak intensities. Matrix effects in GC (Fujiyoshi et al, 2016;Sakthiselvi et al, 2020) are important for determining the extent of background noise. These matrix effects will depend on sample type, concentration, preparation, and introduction, as well as the chromatography and acquisition strategies employed.…”
Section: Peak Filtering To Remove Background Contaminants and Artifactsmentioning
confidence: 99%