2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2020.105811
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the factors influencing the treatment performance of a livestock constructed wetland

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some researches [12,13] report ammonia nitrogen and total nitrogen removal efficiencies of 35% and 53%, respectively, for domestic water, because of the lack of sufficient dissolved oxygen. Similar performances have been showed for wastewater released from livestock using CWs as depuration system [14]. These removal efficiencies can be increased by artificial forced aeration systems in CWs [15].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Some researches [12,13] report ammonia nitrogen and total nitrogen removal efficiencies of 35% and 53%, respectively, for domestic water, because of the lack of sufficient dissolved oxygen. Similar performances have been showed for wastewater released from livestock using CWs as depuration system [14]. These removal efficiencies can be increased by artificial forced aeration systems in CWs [15].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Therefore, this study mainly focused on evaluating the treatment performance of several constructed wetlands installed across South Korea. Similar studies regarding the treatment performance of constructed wetlands in South Korea were conducted by several authors [31][32][33][34][35]; however, a nationwide survey of constructed wetlands treating runoff from various land use types has not been performed yet. Furthermore, the ecosystem services provided by nature-based systems are often overlooked since the efficiency of facilities is commonly assessed only in terms of their pollutant removal capabilities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…As shown in Equation ( 1), EMC can be calculated by dividing the total cumulative pollutant load throughout the rainfall duration t by the cumulative runoff volume. EMC is frequently used to quantify non-point source pollution during storm events in the catchment area of research facilities [31,40].…”
Section: Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Manure, as the primary organic byproduct of livestock production, represents a highly costeffective source for biogas production through anaerobic digestion (Ch'ng, Ahmed, Kassim, & Majid, 2014). Although manure can be processed using a variety of techniques, including composting (Zhang et al, 2020), vermicomposting (Cao, Tian, Wu, Li, & Zhu, 2021), slurry treatment, and stabilization wetlands (Reyes, Geronimo, & Kim, 2020), among others. The anaerobic digestion process offers numerous advantages, such as the production of high-quality fertilizer, the mitigation of foul odors, the elimination of microbial pathogens, and the promotion of sustainable energy generation through the production of biogas (Connolly, Lund, & Mathiesen, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%