2018
DOI: 10.4103/ijh.ijh_37_17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the expression of CD200 and CD56 in CD34-positive adult acute myeloid leukemia and its effect on the response to induction of chemotherapy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This was in agreement with Tonks et al, 2007, which demonstrates expressing association of inv ( 16) (generally associated with FAB-M4 easo) with significantly overexpressed CD200 when compared to M4 patients without inv ( 16). These all conduct to CD200 is expressed more with monocytic differentiated AML than in myeloid differintiated AML which is in agreement with Muhsin et al, 2017 who found CD200 expressed more in monocytic subtypes (M4-M5), and found extramedullary manifestation more with CD200 positive expression. There was a statistically significant relation between CD200 postive expression and CD34 positive cases.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This was in agreement with Tonks et al, 2007, which demonstrates expressing association of inv ( 16) (generally associated with FAB-M4 easo) with significantly overexpressed CD200 when compared to M4 patients without inv ( 16). These all conduct to CD200 is expressed more with monocytic differentiated AML than in myeloid differintiated AML which is in agreement with Muhsin et al, 2017 who found CD200 expressed more in monocytic subtypes (M4-M5), and found extramedullary manifestation more with CD200 positive expression. There was a statistically significant relation between CD200 postive expression and CD34 positive cases.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…In respect to analysis of CD200 expression in 104 newly diagnosed AML patients in our study: CD200 positive expression (≥20%) was frequently detected in our patients (59.5%) patients. In comparison to 76.5% reported by Atfy et al, 2015 and 56%, 48%, 43%, 53.3% detected in studies by Damiani et al, 2015-Tiribelli et al, 2017-Tonks et al, 2007and Muhsin et al, 2017 respectively in AML. Also, in patients with precursor leukaemia lymphoma it was found CD200 positive expressed in (66%, 95 and 80.3%) reported by Aref et al, 2018-Alapat et al 2012and Awad et al, 2016 We can suggest CD200 be used as a minimal residual disease marker as well as for targeted antibody therapy, anti-CD200 antibody direct to CD200 + AML cells, this antibody-based therapy can stimulate cell phagocytosis to increase the possibility of AML curing and to limit AML relapse.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…19,15 CD7 and TdT were both expressed in 10% of AML cases for each, most of the studies reported results higher than ours as for CD7 (43%, 40%, 33%, 18% and 12%). 4,14,[21][22][23] As for TdT, other studies reported frequencies of (6.2% and 15.4%) 8,24 CD19 was expressed 2.6% of AML cases in our study while most of the studies reported higher frequencies of (27%, 15.8% and 10.7%) 4,16,20 CD56 was expressed in 7.7% of AML cases in our study, the majority of studies reported higher frequencies (15% and 17.3%). 13,25 Aberrant expression in B-ALL The frequency of aberrant phenotype in B-ALL cases in the current study was 48.8% higher result of 71% was reported by Jalal et al while Ahuja and Malviya reported a frequency of 60%.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present study, aberrant expression of B markers in AML patients showed that CD79a was the most frequently expressed marker at 16.7% [15/90] of all AML patients, followed by CD10 and CD22 at 5.6% [5/90] and 1.1% [1/90], respectively, while expression of T marker CD7 in AML patients was 12.2% [11/90]. Other studies noted different distributions of aberrant marker expression, and many of them reported that CD7 was the most common lymphoidassociated antigen in AML, followed by CD19 [11,12] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%