2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.03.050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of SWAT models performance to simulate streamflow spatial origin. The case of a small forested watershed

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
29
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
2
29
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This can be explained by reduced infiltration, which is estimated using Equation (11). As the rainfall amount becomes greater, the CN estimated using the asymptotic CN approach becomes lower, resulting in a greater value of S (the potential maximum retention, mm).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can be explained by reduced infiltration, which is estimated using Equation (11). As the rainfall amount becomes greater, the CN estimated using the asymptotic CN approach becomes lower, resulting in a greater value of S (the potential maximum retention, mm).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nitrate and sediment load simulations were compared to sampled data collected once or twice a month from 2000 to 2010 ( Table 1). The Load Estimator model (LOADEST) [78] was used for each physicochemical station due to the lack of nitrate and sediment data in order to generate monthly nitrate and sediment load and extend time series, as commonly used to calibrate and validate SWAT outputs [79][80][81]. This software generates water quality parameters through regressions between streamflow and water quality [78].…”
Section: The Conventional Calibration (Cc)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ree variables including R 2 (coefficient of determination), RE (relative error), and E ns (Nash-Sutcliffe simulation efficiency) were considered as the key indicator of the accuracy. In general, SWAT needs to modify the value of hydrological parameters for the model calibration and validation [20]. In this study, 8 parameter values were used including Alpha_BF, Gwqmn, Gw_Revap, Sol_Awc, Epco, Esco, Ch_N2, and Gw_delay.…”
Section: Future Inflow Into the Ubolrat Reservoirmentioning
confidence: 99%