2018
DOI: 10.2298/mpns1806157r
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of spirometric parameters and maximum oxygen consumption in athletes and non-athletes

Abstract: Introduction. There is a great interest to identify factors that influence the value of maximum oxygen consumption. The goal of this research was to assess the body composition, pulmonary parameters, and maximum oxygen consumption in different types of sports and in non-athletes. Material and Methods. The research included 149 male participants: aerobic athletes (n = 55), anaerobic athletes (n = 53) and non-athletes (n = 41). The participants were tested at the Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(14 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this research the level was higher: 15.3 ± 2.6 in the first test, and 14.6 ± 3.0 in the second. The level was similar to young non-athletes [24] but BMI was similar to athletes. Interestingly, the parameters were much better than those obtained in [8], where body fat mass in % was 23.4 ± 7.5 in the first test (before the training program) and 23.6 ± 7.0 in the second, after a six-month triathlon training program.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…In this research the level was higher: 15.3 ± 2.6 in the first test, and 14.6 ± 3.0 in the second. The level was similar to young non-athletes [24] but BMI was similar to athletes. Interestingly, the parameters were much better than those obtained in [8], where body fat mass in % was 23.4 ± 7.5 in the first test (before the training program) and 23.6 ± 7.0 in the second, after a six-month triathlon training program.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Study from Malik et al (2017) explain the cause of the results insignificant can occur if there is possible bias of the control group where they significantly have higher BMI than with a group of aerobic athletes or anaerobic (Malik, 2017). Rakovac et al (2018) in Serbia, there is no difference in FVC values and FEV1 in the aerobics, anaerobic athlete group and non-athlete ccaused of a significant difference between anthropometric measurements in any group that make the appearance of bias (Rakovac, 2018).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%