2015
DOI: 10.4238/2015.october.19.10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of soybean lines and environmental stratification using the AMMI, GGE biplot, and factor analysis methods

Abstract: ABSTRACT. In the final phases of new soybean cultivar development, lines are cultivated in several locations across multiple seasons with the intention of identifying and selecting superior genotypes for quantitative traits. In this context, this study aimed to study the genotype-byenvironment interaction for the trait grain yield (kg/ha), and to evaluate the adaptability and stability of early-cycle soybean genotypes using the additive main effects and multiplicative interaction (AMMI) analysis,

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
26
0
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
4
26
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, the genotypes Delta Opal (G7) and BRS BURITI (G2) were the most unstable. Importantly, we note that the classification of genotypes based on phenotypic stability was similar from both methods used in this study, corroborating previous results (Balestre et al, 2009;Miranda et al 2009;Camargo-Buitrago et al, 2011;Mattos et al, 2013;Sousa et al, 2015). An ideal genotype should have a mean seed cotton yield that is consistently high over all environments of interest.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…In contrast, the genotypes Delta Opal (G7) and BRS BURITI (G2) were the most unstable. Importantly, we note that the classification of genotypes based on phenotypic stability was similar from both methods used in this study, corroborating previous results (Balestre et al, 2009;Miranda et al 2009;Camargo-Buitrago et al, 2011;Mattos et al, 2013;Sousa et al, 2015). An ideal genotype should have a mean seed cotton yield that is consistently high over all environments of interest.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Estimates of decomposition of the complex G × E interaction greater than 50% represented a predominance of complex interactions (Sousa et al, 2015), indicating the changes in the magnitude of the differences among genotypes in different environments or from changes in their relative ranking (Sivcev et al, 2011). The major challenge of plant breeders was to find the useful information hidden within the multi-environment data, and then interpret and use it effectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Soybean yield is a complex quantitative trait controlled by many genes, and it is determined by multiple interactions between genes and environment (Li et al, 2008), greatly affected by environmental conditions especially day length of different latitude (Singh and Vatsa, 2009;Zhang et al, 2015;Bhartiya and Aditya, 2016;AbdulHamid et al, 2017). Photoperiod is the leading climatic factor in determining soybean adaptation to different eco-regions (Câmara et al, 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The seed yield of nine genotypes were significantly affected by environment, genotype, and GEI. The coefficient of variation (CV) for seed yield was 12.34%, indicating the precision of experimental research and control of environmental factors [8]. The highly significant genotype indicates the different performance of genotypes across environments [5].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, the additive main effects and multiplicative interaction analysis (AMMI) have been widely used to quantify the genotypic effects of the GEI [6,7,8,9,10]. AMMI biplot analysis is defined as a useful tool to explore the GEI patterns [11] with simple graphic representation of genotypes and environments in a multivariate biplot [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%