2018
DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/102/1/012044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Yield stability of soybean promising lines across environments

Abstract: Abstract. Soybean is grown in the wide range of environments in Indonesia, hence the genotype and environment interaction is become one of major complication in the breeding programs. The objective of this study was to evaluate the stability performance of soybean promising lines in eight locations during the dry season 2015. A completely randomized block design with four replicates was used to arrange the experiment. An additive main effects and multiplicative interaction (AMMI) model was used to examine the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some of the high yielding faba bean genotypes reported in the present study were sensitive to environmental changes. Similar results were also obtained in other crops such as soybean [80,81].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Some of the high yielding faba bean genotypes reported in the present study were sensitive to environmental changes. Similar results were also obtained in other crops such as soybean [80,81].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The GEI contributed more at 24.04% of total SS. The smaller proportions of genotype and larger proportions of environment and GEI factors reflected similar figures from some stability analysis studies in Indonesian soybean [12][13][14]. a higher yield than G14 (Detam 1) based on least significant difference (LSD) α = 5%.…”
Section: Grain Yield Performance Accross Multiple Environmentssupporting
confidence: 72%
“…The environment with the least discrimination but the most representation for the majority of attributes was E3 ( Figure 7D ). The large environmental difference suggested that there were genotypic variations in adaptation ( Krisnawati and Adie, 2018 ). Regarding the stability of yield attributes, genotypes also varied greatly.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%