1999
DOI: 10.1097/00000637-199903000-00009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Soft-Tissue Morphology of the Face in 1,050 Young Adults

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

11
73
1
4

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
11
73
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Whereas special face height was shorter than the special head height for both males and females in African American and North American white people [6,18,19]. In addition, when we compare our results for canon I with findings that were obtained from other studies in Turkish population the differences were seen between findings [2,3]. The results show that there may be differences in the facial proportions even in different regions of the same country.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 51%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Whereas special face height was shorter than the special head height for both males and females in African American and North American white people [6,18,19]. In addition, when we compare our results for canon I with findings that were obtained from other studies in Turkish population the differences were seen between findings [2,3]. The results show that there may be differences in the facial proportions even in different regions of the same country.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 51%
“…Most of anthropometric data about the neoclassical canons comes from Farkas' work on North American white populations [6,7,10,15]. But another studies of Korean [4], Indian [12], African American [18], Turkish [2,3] and Chinese [13] subjects as well as the present study, reported that some of the Abbreviations as in Table 1 neoclassical canons may fit a few subjects and they do not represent the average facial proportions. In our study, especially the three-section and the four-section facial proportion could not be found valid even in a single participant.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 49%
“…Humans are different by their overall morphology and body dimensions. The human facial contour has always been an interesting subject for anatomists, anthropologists, plastic surgeons and artists 1 . From the human facial form, it is possible to make an absolute distinction between two ethnic groups 2 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2,4,[13][14][15]17,21,25,31,33,36 Existing data have been generated by direct measurement (anthropometrics) and/or radiographic measurement (cephalometrics) of orbital anatomical characteristics and have more recently included ultrasound measurements of fetuses in utero. 34 Anthropometric measurements have generated a large database of normal values based on surface measurements, in which relatively thin soft tissues overlie bony surfaces, allowing for accurate measurement without the use of ionizing radiation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The largest proportion of anthropometric data applies to adults 4,9,17,18,[22][23][24][25]30,31,36 and to a lesser extent to the pediatric population. 9,13,16,18,19,21,27,30,36 There are relatively few data available for children younger than 3 years.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%