2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2009.12.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of shape variability of stallion sperm heads by means of image analysis and Fourier descriptors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The largest difference is observed near the sharp end of the eggshell. Another possibility of how to describe the egg contour with a function obtained from non-linear regression, which depends on L and B, is proposed by Severa et al [22] This procedure could be an alternative to the above-mentioned approach.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The largest difference is observed near the sharp end of the eggshell. Another possibility of how to describe the egg contour with a function obtained from non-linear regression, which depends on L and B, is proposed by Severa et al [22] This procedure could be an alternative to the above-mentioned approach.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Studies by Saravia et al (2007) have demonstrated that Duroc boars have got larger and more elliptical heads than boars of other breeds. Determining differences is sperm head dimensions facilitates more precise assessment of the boar's spermiogram (Severa et al 2010). Sperm head abnormalities make it possible to distinguish fertile males from boars with decreased fertility (Gravance et al 1996).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sperm concentration was evaluated haemocytometrically and the number of sperm was counted in Bürker's chamber. Morphological evaluation of the ejac ulate was conducted on preparations stained using the method of Farelly (SEVERA et al, 2010). In each preparation 200 sperm were evaluated and if they had no defect they were evaluated as "morphologically normal sperm" (PEÑA MARTÍNEZ, 2004).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%