2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2016.03.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Shape of Graphite Particles in Cast Irons by a Shape Factor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although cast iron has various superior characteristics as mentioned above, the presence of graphite causes some undesirable affection to various mechanical properties due to the decrease of the effective sectional area of matrix and producing internal notch effect [4] [5] [6], therefore, cast iron is regarded as a material with a less anti-impact characteristic than that of steel. On the other hand, cast iron is also regarded as a material which is less sensitive against outer-notch than steel [7], but this characteristic has not been systematically investigated so far [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although cast iron has various superior characteristics as mentioned above, the presence of graphite causes some undesirable affection to various mechanical properties due to the decrease of the effective sectional area of matrix and producing internal notch effect [4] [5] [6], therefore, cast iron is regarded as a material with a less anti-impact characteristic than that of steel. On the other hand, cast iron is also regarded as a material which is less sensitive against outer-notch than steel [7], but this characteristic has not been systematically investigated so far [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Especially, 65-45-12 sample composed of imperfect graphite spherulites with separated sectors. Advanced segmentation methods like active contour method [20] and shape factors that are sensitive to surface irregularities [21] can be utilized in order to quantify the effect of perimeter morphology. Figure 7a compares graphite, pearlite and ferrite percentages in all samples.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As it can be seen in Figure 1c, some regions of the contour of the model are completely straight due to the contour that is computed at the pixel level; besides, other sections have corners with angles of 45 • and 90 • , which can produce stress concentrators in a FEA. Furthermore, these sections do not represent the geometric characteristics of graphite nodules, since a DCI is characterized by the semi-sphericity of its graphite nodules, as they have a CSF value of between 0.9 and 1 [15]. These geometric characteristics are a part of the errors that are produced by the discretization at the pixel level at the time of obtaining the contours through image processing.…”
Section: Discretization Error Due To Image Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the pixels belonging to the contours are identified, their coordinates are stored and grouped into a set depending on the graphite nodule (gray level) to which each pixel corresponds. In this same step, it is obtained the perimeter and the total area corresponding to each graphite nodule, which are required to calculate the CSF dig [15]. Then, the coordinates of the points and the CSF dig values of the graphite nodules contours are written in a text file, which is used to carry out the next stage.…”
Section: Extraction Of the Graphite Nodule Contoursmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation