2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.pan.2016.10.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Rosemont criteria for non-calcific chronic pancreatitis (NCCP) based on histopathology – A retrospective study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…EUS is the most sensitive endoscopic test for diagnosing chronic pancreatitis and is recommended for diagnosing early stages of the disease or complications that may accompany disease progression, such as stones, strictures, or concurrent pancreatic malignancy [32]. According to a recent analysis of the Rosemont criteria, which is a scoring system for EUS to diagnose chronic pancreatitis, a “normal” classification is very poorly correlated with histopathology, whereas the classification “suggestive” of chronic pancreatitis is highly associated with histopathology [36]. However, another study of the same cohort reported a very poor correlation between EUS features and the degree of fibrosis determined by histopathology, suggesting that EUS is less accurate than previously believed [37].…”
Section: Update In the Diagnosis Of Chronic Pancreatitismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EUS is the most sensitive endoscopic test for diagnosing chronic pancreatitis and is recommended for diagnosing early stages of the disease or complications that may accompany disease progression, such as stones, strictures, or concurrent pancreatic malignancy [32]. According to a recent analysis of the Rosemont criteria, which is a scoring system for EUS to diagnose chronic pancreatitis, a “normal” classification is very poorly correlated with histopathology, whereas the classification “suggestive” of chronic pancreatitis is highly associated with histopathology [36]. However, another study of the same cohort reported a very poor correlation between EUS features and the degree of fibrosis determined by histopathology, suggesting that EUS is less accurate than previously believed [37].…”
Section: Update In the Diagnosis Of Chronic Pancreatitismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies have compared EUS features with MRCP (with or without secretin), secretin-stimulated pancreatic function testing, and histology. 25 Although some comparisons are promising, the lack of a criterion standard and the role of confounding factors have not been appropriately addressed.…”
Section: Eus Performance and Interpretation In Benign Pancreatic Disementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies have compared EUS features with MRCP (with or without secretin), secretin-stimulated pancreatic function testing, and histology. 26 Although some comparisons are promising, the lack of a criterion standard and the role of confounding factors have not been appropriately addressed.…”
Section: Eus Performance and Interpretation In Benign Pancreatic Disementioning
confidence: 99%