2007
DOI: 10.2337/diaclin.25.2.43
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Inaccuracies in the Measurement of Glycemia in the Laboratory, by Glucose Meters, and Through Measurement of Hemoglobin A1c

Abstract: IN BRIEF The accurate measurement of glucose is extremely important in the diagnosis of diabetes and pre-diabetes, where the laboratory values are crucial; in the management of diabetes, where glucose meter values are crucial; and in attainment of goals in diabetes, where hemoglobin A1c measurement is crucial. This article reviews pitfalls that may interfere with accuracy of glucose measurement in each of these three areas and how this inaccuracy may be evaluated and managed in the primary care … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
26
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(8 reference statements)
2
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A number of factors, including blood sampling technique and improper meter calibration, may potentially affect reliability of blood glucose meter readings. 18 Questionable reliability of blood glucose records, particularly Evidence-Based Clinical Decision Making the underreporting of high blood glucose values, 32 suggests that downloading of blood glucose meters provides more complete and valid blood glucose monitoring data compared to self-reporting using logbooks. A recent study 33 compared laboratorydetermined venous blood glucose values with simultaneous readings from two modern glucose meters and found high accuracy of meter values.…”
Section: Implication For Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of factors, including blood sampling technique and improper meter calibration, may potentially affect reliability of blood glucose meter readings. 18 Questionable reliability of blood glucose records, particularly Evidence-Based Clinical Decision Making the underreporting of high blood glucose values, 32 suggests that downloading of blood glucose meters provides more complete and valid blood glucose monitoring data compared to self-reporting using logbooks. A recent study 33 compared laboratorydetermined venous blood glucose values with simultaneous readings from two modern glucose meters and found high accuracy of meter values.…”
Section: Implication For Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In both the present study, and in the published results of the 2003 SFSOD and 2010 GWAS, T2DM was assessed as fasting serum glucose ≥7.0mmol/L and/or on medication for T2DM. Biological studies have shown there are no clinically significant differences between measuring glucose in serum or plasma [17,18], although WHO and IDF recommend that glucose should be measured in venous plasma [10]. In this study serum glucose values were converted to plasma-equivalents using: − 0.137+1.047x , where x is serum glucose (mmol/L) [19].…”
Section: Adjustment For Exclusion Of Known T2dm 1991 and 1995 Sacrf Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in most laboratory panels, serum is the most suitable sample for all other chemistries performed, and so ''panel'' glucose is usually serum glucose. The requirement that serum samples must be allowed to clot before serum glucose is tested significantly increases turnaround time for glucose results compared with plasma results [11]. There is also some suggestion that clotting consumes glucose [6].…”
Section: Dear Sirmentioning
confidence: 99%