2012
DOI: 10.1016/s2221-1691(12)60235-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of in-vitro antibacterial activity and anti-inflammatory activity for different extracts of Rauvolfia tetraphylla L. root bark

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar results were reported in R. tetraphylla (Suresh et al, 2008), (Kumar et al, 2010) and (Rao et al, 2012), has revealed in vitro antibacterial activities of root bark extract in R. tetraphylla.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Similar results were reported in R. tetraphylla (Suresh et al, 2008), (Kumar et al, 2010) and (Rao et al, 2012), has revealed in vitro antibacterial activities of root bark extract in R. tetraphylla.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The total root extracts exhibits a variety of effects viz., sedation, hypertension, brodyeardia, myosis, ptosis and tremors which are typical of reserpine (Mulliken and Crofton, 2008;Selvam, 2012). Pharmacological studies demonstrate that Rauwolfia possesses cardiovascular (Anitha and Kumari, 2006), antihypertensive (Von Poser et al, 1990), antiarrhythmic (Kirillova et al, 2001), antiinflammatory (Rao et al, 2012), antipyretic (Amole and Onabanjo, 1999), antidiabetic (Campbell et al, 2006), anticancer (Bemis et al, 2006), hypoglycaemic and hypolipidemic (Qureshi et al, 2009), hepatoprotective (Gupta et al, 2006), sedative (Weerakoon et al, 1998), antihistaminase (Sachdev et al, 1961), mosquito larvicidal (Das and Chandra, 2012), antidiarrhoeal (Ezeigbo et al, 2012) and antimicrobial activities (Ahmed et al, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Determination of antibacterial activity: The perforated diffusion method was used to measure the degree of antibacterial activity 19 . Initially, 18 mL of the nutrient agar was added to each petri dish.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%