2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.livsci.2009.06.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of estimated genetic merit for carcass weight in beef cattle: Live weights, feed intake, body measurements, skeletal and muscular scores, and carcass characteristics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

24
62
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
(56 reference statements)
24
62
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Clarke et al (2009) reported that beef weanlings and post-weanlings were heavier than dairy breeds and this was also reflected in greater muscularity scores in the animals. Better kill-out percentage, greater muscularity, better carcass conformation and greater live-weight were also Factors associated with cattle selling price associated with beef breeds (Keane, 2003;Campion et al, 2009;Clarke et al, 2009) relative to their dairy contemporaries. The higher prices across all maturity categories in this study for the Charolais and Belgian Blue animals is consistent with the superior carcass traits and live-weights that have been reported for these two breeds (Alberti et al, 2008;Campion et al, 2009;Clarke et al, 2009).…”
Section: Seasonal Effectsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Clarke et al (2009) reported that beef weanlings and post-weanlings were heavier than dairy breeds and this was also reflected in greater muscularity scores in the animals. Better kill-out percentage, greater muscularity, better carcass conformation and greater live-weight were also Factors associated with cattle selling price associated with beef breeds (Keane, 2003;Campion et al, 2009;Clarke et al, 2009) relative to their dairy contemporaries. The higher prices across all maturity categories in this study for the Charolais and Belgian Blue animals is consistent with the superior carcass traits and live-weights that have been reported for these two breeds (Alberti et al, 2008;Campion et al, 2009;Clarke et al, 2009).…”
Section: Seasonal Effectsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Better kill-out percentage, greater muscularity, better carcass conformation and greater live-weight were also Factors associated with cattle selling price associated with beef breeds (Keane, 2003;Campion et al, 2009;Clarke et al, 2009) relative to their dairy contemporaries. The higher prices across all maturity categories in this study for the Charolais and Belgian Blue animals is consistent with the superior carcass traits and live-weights that have been reported for these two breeds (Alberti et al, 2008;Campion et al, 2009;Clarke et al, 2009). As many of the female dairy animals that are purchased through the marts are likely to be retained as replacements, this was reflected in the premium prices paid for dairy females compared with their male counterparts, similar to the findings of Dal Zotto et al (2009).…”
Section: Seasonal Effectsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Skeletal scores (9-point scale) were recorded at three locations and muscular scores (15-point scale) were recorded at four locations. These scores were aggregated to give one overall skeletal and one overall muscular score per animal (Campion et al, 2009a). All animals were turned out to pasture together on 25 March for a second grazing season of 209 days.…”
Section: Animal Sourcementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Carcass weights for all commercially slaughtered cattle (including culled cows) are captured in a central database and are used in the ICBF genetic evaluation programme as the measure of lifetime growth rate. Breeding value for carcass weight is derived using a multi-trait animal model and expressed as the expected progeny difference for carcass weight (EPD CWT ), estimated as a deviation from a common base carcass weight for Holstein-Friesian steers (Campion et al, 2009a). Age at slaughter, among other factors, is adjusted for in the model as a fixed effect.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation