2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.sleep.2007.03.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of autoCPAP devices in home treatment of sleep apnea/hypopnea syndrome

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
1
4

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
19
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Some of these systems can also provide information about the residual apneas or hypopneas while patients are on CPAP (i.e., automated CPAP) ( Figure 1B) [36,37] . Although treatment with automated CPAP improves patient satisfaction and compliance in a subset of patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), the routine use of automated CPAP for OSA treatment provides limited benefit [38][39][40] . Furthermore, although Figure 1 Effects of positive airway pressure on hemodynamics.…”
Section: Cpapmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of these systems can also provide information about the residual apneas or hypopneas while patients are on CPAP (i.e., automated CPAP) ( Figure 1B) [36,37] . Although treatment with automated CPAP improves patient satisfaction and compliance in a subset of patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), the routine use of automated CPAP for OSA treatment provides limited benefit [38][39][40] . Furthermore, although Figure 1 Effects of positive airway pressure on hemodynamics.…”
Section: Cpapmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meurice et al ont montré que ces deux modes de ventilation étaient équiva-lents en matière d'acceptance à long terme du traitement à domicile du SAHOS sévère [22].…”
Section: Odds Ratio Punclassified
“…Despite differences in the mean CPAP, pressure delivered by the different devices, there clinically no significant differences over the 6-month treatment period. This study, however, was not adequately powered to prove equivalence but raises interesting questions concerning the clinical significance of small differences in therapeutic pressure administered (37). …”
Section: Scientific Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A study (total n=83) comparing PSG-derived CPAP and four different APAP devices administered to patients with severe OSA over a 6-month time period revealed no differences in adherence, clinical symptoms, or HR-QOL (37). Despite differences in the mean CPAP, pressure delivered by the different devices, there clinically no significant differences over the 6-month treatment period.…”
Section: Scientific Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%