2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2010.07.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of 2,4-D and Dicamba genotoxicity in bean seedlings using comet and RAPD assays

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
36
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
4
36
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The damaging activity of dicamba in different mammalian cell targets was also previously observed by the same research group (Gonzàlez et al 2006(Gonzàlez et al , 2007(Gonzàlez et al , 2009). The results of these studies and some others (Amer and Aly 2001;Cenkci et al 2010) are in agreement with the results of our study, although different cell types and/or test system were used.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The damaging activity of dicamba in different mammalian cell targets was also previously observed by the same research group (Gonzàlez et al 2006(Gonzàlez et al , 2007(Gonzàlez et al , 2009). The results of these studies and some others (Amer and Aly 2001;Cenkci et al 2010) are in agreement with the results of our study, although different cell types and/or test system were used.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Unfortunately, to our best knowledge, there is no study available on the genotoxic and/ or cytotoxic effects of NAAm on humans in the literature. However, some synthetic auxins, such as 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) (Holland et al 2002;Cenkci et al 2010), dicamba (Gonzàlez et al 2007(Gonzàlez et al , 2009Gonzàlez et al 2011), and synthetic IAA (Salopek-Sondi et al 2010) have been found genotoxic, mutagenic and cytotoxic in various test systems. Thus, taking into account these facts, it has become important to evaluate the possible genotoxic potential of NAAm on humans.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of researchers have shown the genotoxic potential of 2,4-D that were investigated by using different test systems including chromosome aberration assay, micronucleus and comet assay technique that monitor genotoxic effects on plants (25)(26)(27)(28). The advantage of measuring the direct effects of genotoxins on DNA mainly depends on its sensitive and non-time consuming properties (25).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies have used the comet, micronucleus, or chromosome aberration assays to measure the effects of heavy metals and other genotoxic agents on plants (Cenkci et al, 2010). Advantages of measuring effects of genotoxic chemicals directly on DNA are mainly related to the sensitivity and short response time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Genotoxicity as a result of metal toxicity is also described to play a major role in DNA damage induction (Halliwell, 1990). Toxic chemicals induce several cellular stress responses and damage different cellular components such as membranes, proteins, and DNA (Patra & Panda, 1998;Waisberg et al, 2003;Cenkci et al, 2010;Altınözlü et al, 2012;Tran & Popova, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%