2015 86th ARFTG Microwave Measurement Conference 2015
DOI: 10.1109/arftg.2015.7381475
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation and modeling of measurement resolution of a vector network analyzer for extreme impedance measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [7], an active 45 interferometric method was introduced that uses an injected 46 signal, controlled by an I/Q mixer connected to a low-noise 47 amplifier, for the cancelation of the reflection signal. In [8], 48 an evaluation of the measurement resolution of a VNA, 49 based on the setup of [7], was presented but only results 50 for impedances up to 500 were demonstrated. Both the 51 passive and active methods introduced, require complicated 52 measurement setups, potentially increasing the measurement 53 uncertainty.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [7], an active 45 interferometric method was introduced that uses an injected 46 signal, controlled by an I/Q mixer connected to a low-noise 47 amplifier, for the cancelation of the reflection signal. In [8], 48 an evaluation of the measurement resolution of a VNA, 49 based on the setup of [7], was presented but only results 50 for impedances up to 500 were demonstrated. Both the 51 passive and active methods introduced, require complicated 52 measurement setups, potentially increasing the measurement 53 uncertainty.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [19], the approach is limited to the noise assessment in matched conditions (i.e., ≈ 0) and no solution is offered for highly mismatched cases (i.e., > 0.9). In [3] and [20] improved noise partitioning methods are proposed, giving a frequencydependent noise evaluation over the entire -region. However, these approaches only allow for a noise evaluation for the magnitude component, neglecting the impact of noise in the phase.…”
Section: Noise In S-parameter Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…measurement noise and high accuracy is only achieved when measuring devices under test (DUTs) with impedance levels close to the VNA instrument impedance (Z 0 ), commonly designed to be 50 . When the DUT impedance deviates from Z 0 , the VNA measurement sensitivity degrades progressively [3]- [5] presenting up to two orders of magnitude lower resolution in highly mismatched conditions, shown in Fig. 1.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%