2015
DOI: 10.1120/jacmp.v16i2.5141
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation and mitigation of potential errors in radiochromic film dosimetry due to film curvature at scanning

Abstract: This work considers a previously overlooked uncertainty present in film dosimetry which results from moderate curvature of films during the scanning process. Small film samples are particularly susceptible to film curling which may be undetected or deemed insignificant. In this study, we consider test cases with controlled induced curvature of film and with film raised horizontally above the scanner plate. We also evaluate the difference in scans of a film irradiated with a typical brachytherapy dose distribut… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
47
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They signify an apparent increase in transmission as that distance becomes smaller in qualitative agreement with a recent finding. 46 Measurements were repeated with a selection of blue and neutral density filters. The results for the #1515 neutral density filter are characteristic for all examples and stand in high contrast to the EBT3 film as there is barely any change of the RGB response values by moving the filter toward the light.…”
Section: B Effect Of Film-light Source Distancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…They signify an apparent increase in transmission as that distance becomes smaller in qualitative agreement with a recent finding. 46 Measurements were repeated with a selection of blue and neutral density filters. The results for the #1515 neutral density filter are characteristic for all examples and stand in high contrast to the EBT3 film as there is barely any change of the RGB response values by moving the filter toward the light.…”
Section: B Effect Of Film-light Source Distancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of them involve only the film: for example, the thickness variations of the active layer 2 , the change in film darkening as a function of post-irradiation time 3 , the influence of humidity and temperature 4,5 , the UV-induced polymerization 6 , etc. Some other uncertainties are a consequence of the interaction of the characteristics of both the film and scanner: for example, the lateral artifact 7,8 , Newton rings 9 , the dependency with the orientation of the film on the scanner bed 10 , the cross talk effect 8 , the dependency on film-to-light source distance 11,12 , etc. Finally, other uncertainties are intrinsic to the scanner: for example, noise 13,14 , the inter-scan variability of the scanner response 11 , warming-up of the lamp 15,16 , differences between color channels 17-20 , etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All films were scanned in the central region of the scanner, away from the calibration area of the scanner. Typical natural curvature of film at scanning can give rise to a maximum height of 1 to 2 mm above scan plane and may introduce dose errors of 1% to 4% 18. To alleviate this error, a specialized film holder was constructed to make the films flush with the scanner plane.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%