Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2015
DOI: 10.1118/1.4929563
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correcting scan‐to‐scan response variability for a radiochromic film‐based reference dosimetry system

Abstract: In the absence of measures to deal with the response irregularities, each factor the authors investigated could lead to dose uncertainty >2%. Those factors related to the film-to-light source distance could be particularly impactful since the authors observed many instances where the curl of film samples had the potential to cause dose uncertainty in excess of 5%. Two expedients will eliminate the uncertainties: a transparent sheet (preferably glass) placed over the scanned film keeps the film-to-light source … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
53
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
(70 reference statements)
1
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The asymmetry in the measured dose profiles, especially in the horizontal direction, was not seen in the MC simulated dose profiles. This asymmetry may be due to a bending of the Gafchromic EBT3 films, as discussed by Lewis and Devic [15], which could lead to errors and asymmetry in the dose measurements. Considering the observed steep lateral dose gradients, position A is not suitable for cell irradiation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The asymmetry in the measured dose profiles, especially in the horizontal direction, was not seen in the MC simulated dose profiles. This asymmetry may be due to a bending of the Gafchromic EBT3 films, as discussed by Lewis and Devic [15], which could lead to errors and asymmetry in the dose measurements. Considering the observed steep lateral dose gradients, position A is not suitable for cell irradiation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resulting scans were then corrected for any interscan variations based on the control film's result compared to the average result in a technique similar to that used by Lewis and Devic. 23 The dose delivered to each experimental film was calculated by the creation of a calibration dose-response curve for the Gafchromic EBT3 film by using standard x-ray fields of 10 × 10 cm at given applied dose levels. This was performed due to the known nonlinear relationship of net optical density to dose-response of the Gafchromic EBT3 film when scanned using an Epson10000XL desktop scanner.…”
Section: A Film Dosimetry Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Irradiated films were later analysed using a web application for radiochromic film dosimetry (Radiochromic.com, v2.2; https://radiochromic. com/) [17], using a correction for scanner response variability [18].…”
Section: Treatment Plan Verificationmentioning
confidence: 99%