2016
DOI: 10.1007/s12524-016-0550-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating the Woody Species Diversity by Means of Remotely Sensed Spectral and Texture Measures in the Urban Forests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Yet, despite the universally known utilities of urban flora, urban forests are still subject to abiotic constraints and disturbances [16]. Furthermore, the urban population growth at 4% rate per decade by 2050 [17], doesn't help to improve the situation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet, despite the universally known utilities of urban flora, urban forests are still subject to abiotic constraints and disturbances [16]. Furthermore, the urban population growth at 4% rate per decade by 2050 [17], doesn't help to improve the situation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Landsat and Sentinel provide openaccess data of higher spectral resolution, which makes them a powerful data source for vegetation analysis [29], compared with for instance QuickBird, which, despite its high spatial resolution, only covers the wavelength corresponding to the visible and nearinfrared (VNIR) (Table 3) [85]. Some moderate-resolution satellites (10-30 m pixel size [89]), such as RapidEye, Landsat-OLI (Operational Land Imager), and Sentinel (Table 3), were used to evaluate the urban forest diversity based on the texture and vegetation indices in four (8%) of the reviewed studies [44,49,72,74]. For instance, Ozkan et al [44], found that spectral and textural properties derived from satellite imagery can be related to woody species diversity and ES assessment in the urban forests even using moderate spatial resolution imagery (Landsat (30 m) and RapidEye (5 m)).…”
Section: Satellite Imagerymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The scientific community has progressed in its use of multiple remotely sensed information sources, including satellite imagery [35][36][37], light detection and ranging or laser scanning detection and ranging (LiDAR) [8,21,36,[38][39][40][41], aerial imagery [7,11,42,43], and digital ground-level images (GLI) [44][45][46]. Although satellites, such as Landsat and Sentinel, do not have the spatial resolution necessary for tree characterization (below four or three meters, according to some authors [10,47,48]), in recent decades, satellite sensors with advanced capabilities have been developed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The texture properties were determined according to the Gray Level Co-occurrence Matrix (GLCM) (Haralick et al 1973). GLCM is widely utilized to describe the textural properties in remote sensing studies (Kayitakire et al 2006;Maltamo et al, 2006;Shamsoddini et al, 2013;Ozdemir and Donoghue 2013;Ozkan et al 2016Ozkan et al ,2020Meng 2016;Zhao et al 2018). There are many texture properties defined by GLCM in three main groups as Contrast, Orderliness and Descriptive (Ozdemir and Karnieli 2011).…”
Section: Predictor Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Satellite images have important advantages such as broad spatial coverage and temporally high frequency (García et al 2018;Ustin and Middleton 2021). Numerous methods have been developed using image features such as reflectance values, texture features and vegetation indices derived from satellite images to estimate forest structural parameters (Ozdemir and Karnieli 2011;Ozkan et al 2016). LiDAR (Light Detection and Ranging) data, an active remote sensing technology, has significant potential for the prediction of forest structural variables.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%