2008
DOI: 10.1143/jjap.47.4898
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating the Optical Index of Ta and Ta-Based Absorbers for an Extreme Ultraviolet Mask Using Extreme Ultraviolet Reflectometry

Abstract: We developed an accurate method for determining the optical index of Ta and Ta-based absorber layers with added nitrogen, oxygen, and boron for an extreme ultraviolet (EUV) mask using EUV reflectometry. The optical index at EUV wavelengths was derived from the density and atomic concentration of the composite materials. The atomic concentrations of Ta and Ta-based absorbers were determined using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and Rutherford backscattering spectrometry (RBS) analysis methods when no inc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When comparing our data at 91.85 eV to the existing literature of direct measurements of the optical constants [30,31,32,33,34,35,36], we find the differences in values, that are summarized in figure 4 alongside those, calculated from atomic scattering factors [10,37,38]. Of those references, the data of Windt et al on Mo, Pt, Ru, and Ta [30], as well as the data of Rodríguez-de Marcos et al on Te [36], Hosoya et al on Ta [35] were obtained from reflection type measurements and are therefore very comparable to ours with respect to methodology and outcome. An exception is the value of Diel et al on Ni [32], which is far off our value and the one from CXRO [10].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When comparing our data at 91.85 eV to the existing literature of direct measurements of the optical constants [30,31,32,33,34,35,36], we find the differences in values, that are summarized in figure 4 alongside those, calculated from atomic scattering factors [10,37,38]. Of those references, the data of Windt et al on Mo, Pt, Ru, and Ta [30], as well as the data of Rodríguez-de Marcos et al on Te [36], Hosoya et al on Ta [35] were obtained from reflection type measurements and are therefore very comparable to ours with respect to methodology and outcome. An exception is the value of Diel et al on Ni [32], which is far off our value and the one from CXRO [10].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…From atomic scattering factors: black triangles[10], green triangles[37,38], from reflectance measurements: blue rectangles[30]. From various other studies: magenta diamonds, Mo[31], Ni[32], Pt[33], Ru[34], Ta[35], Te[36].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In-situ XRD (IS-XRD) to inspect crystallization across temperature range [20,26] The absorber film morphology is preferably nano-crystalline or amorphous, which is challenging to achieve for most single metals. Crystallinity however, is very likely to impair surface roughness and etch bias.…”
Section: Film Morphologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surface chemical state X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) [26] Bulk elemental composition Sputter-assisted XPS for composition depth profile TEM with energy dispersive X-ray analysis (TEM-EDS) Density for optical constant estimation X-ray reflectometry (XRR)…”
Section: Characterization Metrologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, the EUV mask reflectometer [11] was used for the EUV transmittance measurement, which was located at the BL-10 beamline of NewSUBARU synchrotron light facility. Figure 3 shows the photograph of the EUV mask reflectometer installed at the BL10.…”
Section: Transmittance Measurement Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%