2013
DOI: 10.4103/0971-6203.106603
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating the effect of ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles for a long-term magnetic cell labeling

Abstract: In order to evaluate the long-term viability, the iron content stability, and the labeling efficiency of mammalian cells using magnetic cell labeling; dextran-coated ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide (USPIOs) nanoparticles with plain surfaces having a hydrodynamic size of 25 nm were used for this study. Tests were carried out in four groups each containing 5 flasks of 5.5 × 106 AD-293 embryonic kidney cells. The cell lines were incubated for 24 h using four different iron concentrations with and without … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Prussian blue staining was used to assess the presence of iron inside the hASCs. The method has been commonly used to evaluate the uptake of iron oxide particles inside cells [17,18,30]. Approximately 70 USPIO-labelled hASCs per mm 2 were seeded onto a glass coverslip.…”
Section: Cell Labelling With Ultrasmall Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Prussian blue staining was used to assess the presence of iron inside the hASCs. The method has been commonly used to evaluate the uptake of iron oxide particles inside cells [17,18,30]. Approximately 70 USPIO-labelled hASCs per mm 2 were seeded onto a glass coverslip.…”
Section: Cell Labelling With Ultrasmall Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the reagent is highly volatile and toxic, and hence safer methods for cell visualization would be preferred. Ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide (USPIO) nanoparticles have also been used to label cells in vitro [17] and in vivo [18]. Although the nanoparticles are often imaged with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) [18,19], they can also be detected by micro-CT imaging [20] based on the Xray absorption differences of materials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, both the cell membrane and IONPs are usually negatively charged, leading to the inefficient labeling of targeted cells because of repulsive electric interactions. Therefore, the complexing of positively charged transfection agents, such as polyethylenimine [ 25 , 26 ], lipofectamine [ 27 , 28 ], poly- l -lysine (PLL) [ 29 , 30 ], and protamine sulfate [ 31 , 32 ], is often introduced to enhance cell labeling efficiency through favorable electrostatic interactions between the target cells and transfection agent-modified IONPs. PLL is commonly used to enhance cell adhesion on the surface of culture dishes and is a potent modifier for IONPs [ 33 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%