2015
DOI: 10.1080/07421222.2015.1095042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating Team Collaboration Quality: The Development and Field Application of a Collaboration Maturity Model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
39
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
39
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In this way, the greater the knowledge transfer, the greater will be the knowledge management maturity (H7). This relationship was positive, according to the results, corroborating the studies of Nonaka and Takeuchi (1995), Derr (1999), Gallagher and Hazlett (1999), Garud and Kumaraswamy (2005) and Boughzala and De Vreede (2015), who theoretically indicated the relation between the knowledge transfer and the knowledge management successively to its maturity. Lin and Hwang (2014) argue that promoting a competitive advantage and optimizing the organizational performance in today's complex and dynamic environment requires the organizational ability to create and transfer new knowledge and practices.…”
Section: Results and Analysissupporting
confidence: 86%
“…In this way, the greater the knowledge transfer, the greater will be the knowledge management maturity (H7). This relationship was positive, according to the results, corroborating the studies of Nonaka and Takeuchi (1995), Derr (1999), Gallagher and Hazlett (1999), Garud and Kumaraswamy (2005) and Boughzala and De Vreede (2015), who theoretically indicated the relation between the knowledge transfer and the knowledge management successively to its maturity. Lin and Hwang (2014) argue that promoting a competitive advantage and optimizing the organizational performance in today's complex and dynamic environment requires the organizational ability to create and transfer new knowledge and practices.…”
Section: Results and Analysissupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Inter‐functional coordination is beneficial to organizational innovation to some degree, particularly when knowledge can be shared among teams to generate a synergistic effect (Nissen et al ., ). Previous studies also indicated that, in team collaboration, groups can complement each other and play a positive role in teamwork innovation because of their shared willingness, dedication, and different skills and knowledge (Montelisciani et al ., ; Boughzala and Vreede, ). When departments have a positive environmental attitude, they believe that firms are responsible for energy saving and emission reduction during the manufacturing process and are obliged to reduce the negative environmental impact resulting from production.…”
Section: Theoretical Foundation and Research Hypothesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The published literature database also indicates publications concerning completely new models of maturity. Among them: energy and utility MM (Ngai et al, 2013), a holistic sales and operations planning MM (S&OP MM) (Wagner, et al, 2014), purchasing MM (Úbeda et al, 2015), service capability sourcing model (SCSM) (Carroll and Helfert, 2015), collaboration maturity model (Col-MM) (Boughzala and De Vreede, 2015), lean MM (Maasouman and Demirli, 2016).…”
Section: Data and Methodsologymentioning
confidence: 99%