2015
DOI: 10.1093/lpr/mgv009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating score- and feature-based likelihood ratio models for multivariate continuous data: applied to forensic MDMA comparison

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…shown to have limitations [28]). The need for some additional consideration (to the likelihood value that is produced by Snipper for assignments) comes from the fact that self-declaration and genetic composition, while expected to broadly align, are not always the same i.e.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…shown to have limitations [28]). The need for some additional consideration (to the likelihood value that is produced by Snipper for assignments) comes from the fact that self-declaration and genetic composition, while expected to broadly align, are not always the same i.e.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Score-based approaches are increasingly popular across multiple branches of forensic science, e.g., [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25]. Quantitative measurements made on objects of interest such as voice recordings, face images, and glass fragments usually result in multivariate data with complex distributions.…”
Section: Score-based Approaches For the Calculation Of Likelihood Ratmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the application of chemometric tools in the 105 forensic science has been gaining importance in recent years [16,17,15,14,18,19,20]. In spite of their usefulness in the field of data mining, outcomes of chemometric tools cannot be directly translated and interpreted for forensic purposes, as they do not always account for all essential aspects listed above (e.g.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%