1991
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2257.1991.tb00544.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating Alternative Regional Planning Models

Abstract: The REMI and IMPLAN models are widely used approaches to estimating economic impacts for small regions. However, few benchmarks exist for assessing these estimates. This paper evaluates the relative performance of these models in terms of a given impact: the opening of an automobile assembly plant in central Illinois. Although our results are not conclusive and are limited by our application, we find that in terms of several indirect performance criteria, IMPLAN's outcomes, on balance, are somewhat more plausi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
24
0
1

Year Published

1995
1995
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
(1 reference statement)
0
24
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…IMPLAN and REMI (Regional Economic Models, Inc.) are the two most widely used regional economic modeling software, with the BEA's RIMS II model receiving moderate use (Rickman and Schwer, 1995). In an evaluation of relative performance, IMPLAN's outcomes were compared to its main competitor REMI and were proven through several indirect performance criteria to be more plausible than those of REMI (Crihfield and Campbell, 1991).…”
Section: Implan Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IMPLAN and REMI (Regional Economic Models, Inc.) are the two most widely used regional economic modeling software, with the BEA's RIMS II model receiving moderate use (Rickman and Schwer, 1995). In an evaluation of relative performance, IMPLAN's outcomes were compared to its main competitor REMI and were proven through several indirect performance criteria to be more plausible than those of REMI (Crihfield and Campbell, 1991).…”
Section: Implan Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A full discussion of the IMPLAN modeling framework can be found in Minnesota IMPLAN Group (1994). Summaries of the various applications of the IMPLAN model can be found in Rose et al (1988) and Crihfield and Campbell (1991). Although the IMPLAN system and REM1 framework have some small differences related to the data they use for regionalizing national data, the multiplier estimates produced by the two modeling systems are very similar.…”
Section: Us Forest Service and The Department Of Agriculture And Appmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Use of the IMPLAN system does not, therefore, pose any problems in consistency with the remainder of the regional analysis. Crihfield and Campbell (1991) compares the two modeling approaches.…”
Section: Us Forest Service and The Department Of Agriculture And Appmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20 We used the IMPLAN software because it is relatively simple, provides reasonable estimates, and is the approach most widely accepted by policymakers. 28 Other approaches to economic impact modeling have also been developed and utilized previously; for example, regression-based modeling, the Regional Economic Model Incorporated Policy Insight (REMI) input-output model, and in the case of the forest service industry, million board feet (MMBF)-based input-output modeling. 8,28,29 The mechanics of input-output analysis are straightforward.…”
Section: Empirical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…28 Other approaches to economic impact modeling have also been developed and utilized previously; for example, regression-based modeling, the Regional Economic Model Incorporated Policy Insight (REMI) input-output model, and in the case of the forest service industry, million board feet (MMBF)-based input-output modeling. 8,28,29 The mechanics of input-output analysis are straightforward. 30 Within a particular economic region, there are n different (mutually exclusive and collectively exhaustive) industries.…”
Section: Empirical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%