2015
DOI: 10.1016/s2007-5057(15)72166-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluación de la fiabilidad del cuestionario sobre estilos de aprendizaje de Felder y Soloman en estudiantes de medicina

Abstract: Introduction: The exponential growth of medical knowledge has been calling for a better training of students in a series of abilities such as creativity, critical thinking, group collaboration skills, and self learning skills. It is therefore important to generate varied and dynamical teaching strategies intended to make student learning easier and to promote the development of the required skills; identifying student learning preferences may facilitate these tasks. Objective: To assess the reliability of the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Una puntuación de 9 a 11 puntos indica una preferencia predominante por una categoría de la escala, según lo planteado por Felder-Silverman. Dicho estudiante tendrá dificultades para aprender bajo métodos de enseñanza que no se relacionen con esa dimensión (Felder & Silverman, 1988;Felder & Spurlin, 2005;Brito-Orta & Espinosa-Tanguma, 2015).…”
Section: Materials Y Métodounclassified
“…Una puntuación de 9 a 11 puntos indica una preferencia predominante por una categoría de la escala, según lo planteado por Felder-Silverman. Dicho estudiante tendrá dificultades para aprender bajo métodos de enseñanza que no se relacionen con esa dimensión (Felder & Silverman, 1988;Felder & Spurlin, 2005;Brito-Orta & Espinosa-Tanguma, 2015).…”
Section: Materials Y Métodounclassified
“…In order to assess learning styles to each student, we employed Felder and Soloman questionnaire [14], a methodology that is currently used in other research [31,32]. The questionnaire consists of 44 questions with dichotomous answers ("a" or "b"), and considers four scales, one for each dimension of the Felder-Silverman model [13]: (1) Active-Reflective (how information is processed); (2) Sensing-Intuitive (type of information best perceived); (3) Visual-Verbal (how sensory information is perceived); and (4) Sequential-Global (progress towards comprehension of information).…”
Section: Learning Stylesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studied to validate the ILS questionnaire have covered adaptations to the structure of the questionnaire (Felder & Spurlin, 2005;Litzinger et al, 2007) or adaptations for other geographic settings or other types of participants (Brito-Orta & Espinosa-Taguma, 2015;Çardak & Selvi, 2016;Platsidou & Metallidou, 2009;Seneler & Petrie, 2018) and their subsequent validation. These works share the use of conventional factor analysis and Cronbach's alpha.…”
Section: Characteristics Of the Ils Questionnairementioning
confidence: 99%