1979
DOI: 10.1016/0025-5408(79)90214-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Etude de la structure cristallographique et magnetique de Cu2FeGeS4 et remarque sur la structure magnetique de Cu2MnSnS4

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
22
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
2
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The average Ge-S distances are 2.240 (4) and 2.244 (5) Å for (I) and (II), respectively. These distances are also close to those of the lithium-containing DLSs: Li 2 FeGeS 4 (Brant, Devlin et al, 2015) (Wintenberger, 1979) and Cu 2 CoGeS 4 (Gulay et al, 2004) are 109.471-109.484 and 109.473-109.579 , respectively. The sulfur anions also exhibit tetrahedral coordination.…”
Section: Figuresupporting
confidence: 67%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The average Ge-S distances are 2.240 (4) and 2.244 (5) Å for (I) and (II), respectively. These distances are also close to those of the lithium-containing DLSs: Li 2 FeGeS 4 (Brant, Devlin et al, 2015) (Wintenberger, 1979) and Cu 2 CoGeS 4 (Gulay et al, 2004) are 109.471-109.484 and 109.473-109.579 , respectively. The sulfur anions also exhibit tetrahedral coordination.…”
Section: Figuresupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Increasing the number of elements in the formula allows for greater tunability of the material's properties; thus, quaternary DLSs are a particularly appealing class of materials. As a result of their technologically relevant properties, these materials are of interest for a number of applications, such as solar cells (Ito & Nakazawa, 1988;Heppke et al, 2020;Liu et al, 2018), batteries (Brant, Devlin et al, 2015;Kaib et al, 2013) and magnetic devices (Wintenberger, 1979;Greenwood & Whitfield, 1968). Furthermore, owing to their inherently non-centrosymmetric structures, DLSs are attractive candidates for infrared nonlinear optical (IR-NLO) devices that make use of secondharmonic generation (SHG) crystals (Ohmer & Pandey 1998): only crystals that lack an inversion center can exhibit SHG.…”
Section: Chemical Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For details on synthetic stannite group phases, see: Salomé et al (2012); Sasamura et al (2012); Tsuji et al 2010). For other stannite group minerals, see: Chen et al (1998); Frenzel (1959); Garin & Parthé (1972); Johan et al (1971); Kaplunnik et al (1977); Kissin & Owens (1989); Marumo & Nowaki (1967); Murciego et al (1999); Szymań ski (1978); Wintenberger (1979). Frenzel (1959) Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2004); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2004); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: Xtal-Draw (Downs & Hall-Wallace, 2003); software used to prepare material for publication: publCIF (Westrip, 2010).…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are numerous minerals with the M II M IV S 4 composition that are derived from the sphalerite structure by ordered substitution of Zn. These are divided into the stannite group (space group I 2 m ) with briartite, Cu 2 (Fe,Zn)GeS 4 (Wintenberger 1979, synthetic), černýite, Cu 2 CdSnS 4 (Szymanski et al , 1978), stannite, Cu 2 FeSnS 4 (Hall et al , 1978) and velikite, Cu 2 HgSnS 4 (Kaplunik et al , 1977), and the kësterite subgroup (space group I ) with ferrokësterite, Cu 2 FeSnS 4 (Kissin and Owens, 1989), hocartite, Ag 2 FeSnS 4 (Caye et al , 1968, structure not solved), kësterite, Cu 2 ZnSnS 4 (Hall et al , 1978), pirquitasite, Ag 2 ZnSnS 4 (Schumer et al , 2013) and zincobriartite, Cu 2 (Zn,Fe)(Ge,Ga)S 4 (McDonald et al , 2016). The two subgroups have two distinct but closely related patterns of ordered substitution of the Zn atoms in sphalerite.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%