Ethical Judgment and Motivation

Faraci, David; McPherson, Tristram

doi:10.4324/9781315213217-20

The Routledge Handbook of Metaethics 2017

DOI: 10.4324/9781315213217-20

|View full text |Cite

Ethical Judgment and Motivation

David Faraci¹,

Tristram McPherson²

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2019

Publication Types

Select...

Article2

Relationship

Self Cite1

Independent1

Authors

Journals

Cited by 2 publications

References 28 publications

(33 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

Ardent realism without referential normativity

McPherson

2019

Inquiry

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper addresses a central positive claim in Matti Eklund's Choosing Normative Concepts: that a certain kind of metaphysically ambitious realist about normativity -the ardent realist -is committed to the metasemantic idea that the distinctive inferential role of normative concepts suffices to fix the extension of those concepts. I argue first that commitment to this sort of inferential role metasemantic view does nothing to secure ardent realism. I then show how the ardent realist can address Eklund's leading challenge without appeal to distinctively metasemantic commitments. * I am indebted for helpful discussion of related ideas to participants and the audience at the Pacific APA symposium on Choosing Normative Concepts (where a distant ancestor of this paper was presented) to participants in my graduate seminar Normative Realism and Normative Authority, to Derek Baker, Matt Bedke, Billy Dunaway, David Plunkett, and especially to Matti himself.

show abstract

Ardent realism without referential normativity

McPherson

2019

Inquiry

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Normative roles, conceptual variance, and ardent realism about normativity

Plunkett

2019

Inquiry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.

Contact Info

hi@scite.ai

10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614

Henderson, NV 89052, USA

Blog Terms and Conditions API Terms Privacy Policy Contact Cookie Preferences Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information

Made with 💙 for researchers

Part of the Research Solutions Family.

Ethical Judgment and Motivation

Cited by 2 publications

References 28 publications

Ardent realism without referential normativity

Ardent realism without referential normativity

Normative roles, conceptual variance, and ardent realism about normativity

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About