Estudio de la &lt;i&gt;Revista Española de Documentación Científica&lt;/i&gt;: análisis comparativo de los periodos 1989-1999 y 2000-2010

Ríos-Hilario, Ana; Rodríguez, Críspulo Travieso

doi:10.3989/redc.2013.3.990

Cited by 8 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Their research involved an analysis of cumulative indexes published in 1986 and 1997 – in the first case – and a metric study of the journal using variables that included methodology, sampling, study design or type of data analysed. This was followed by Jiménez-Hidalgo [9] and Ríos-Hilario and Travieso-Rodríguez [10], who studied time courses, research fields, analysis of methodological approaches, degree of experimentation used and data collection methods.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Journal of Information Science: A gender-based bibliometric study (2015–2020)

Serrano

Avilès

Cuenca

2022

Journal of Information Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Scientific publication is one of the main channels for disseminating research results and one of the most important means of determining the presence of women in scientific research. This article aims to conduct a bibliometric analysis in the Library and Information Science (LIS) field, from a gender perspective, by analysing Journal of Information Science (2015–2020). To reach this goal, the research has been developed in several stages (data collection, gender authors’ identification, validation of authorities, contact by email and analysis of results) to identify 326 contributions and 697 authors finally. Analysis patterns showed outcomes on gender (single and multiple authors), scientific collaboration, authorship time-course, authorship productivity as well as institutional and geographic affiliation. Some conclusions show that male and female authors are not equally represented in the journal, with a great difference in the case of collective authorship. Overall, there is a clear trend of single and multiple male authorship.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Journal of Information Science: A gender-based bibliometric study (2015–2020)

Serrano

Avilès

Cuenca

2022

Journal of Information Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Bibliometría de la colaboración e impacto de la Revista de Biología Tropical (Web of Science 2003-2012)

Filippo

González

Casado

2016

RBT

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Bibliometry of collaboration and impact of the Revista de Biología Tropical (Web of Science 2003-2012).The activity analysis of a scientific journal is relevant to know the evolution of its characteristics over time. In this paper, results of a bibliometric study of the Revista de Biología Tropical/International Journal of Tropical Biology and Conservation (Costa Rica) are presented. The goal of this study was to describe the main characteristics of its scientific production, and analyze its level of collaboration and its impact between the years 2003-2012. Data was derived from the Web of Science (Thomson-Reuters), and the relationship among authors and coauthors, institutions and countries, and their links with the citations received were analyzed for that period. Descriptive statistics about production (number of documents per year, institution and country), collaboration (authorship index, collaboration among institutions and countries) and impact (IF, position in JCR and number of citations received) were collected. Results showed that the journal has published 1 473 papers in this period, in similar proportions English and Spanish. Mexico, Costa Rica, Venezuela and Colombia are the most common countries of origin, with the Universidad of Costa Rica, Universidad Autónoma de Mexico and the University of Puerto Rico as the most common leader institutions. Collaboration between authors, institutions and countries has shown an increasing trend over the last decade. The co-author index was 3.07 per document, 63 % of publications included 2 or more institutions, and 22 % of the papers were product of international collaboration. The most common collaboration link was between Costa Rica and the United States of America. The impact factor has been oscillating during this last decade, reaching a maximum in 2012 (IF JCR = 0.553). Besides, 10 % of the most cited papers concentrated half of the citations received by the journal, and have a very high number of citations, compared with the journal mean. The main countries that cite the journal were USA, Brazil, Mexico, Argentina and Costa Rica. Data showed an increasing collaboration between authors, institutions and countries, and a direct relationship between the increase of this collaboration and the received impact. Rev. Biol. Trop. 64 (1): 147-156. Epub 2016 March 01.

show abstract

Análisis de los proyectos de investigación sobre Información y Documentación del Programa estatal de I+D+i orientada a los retos de la sociedad (2012-2018)

Rodríguez

Ríos-Hilario

2020

EPI

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

An analysis of RTD projects supported by the Spanish RTD plan on societal challenges whose research focuses on the field of Library and Information Science between 2012 and 2018 is performed. Having identified the projects, the following variables are studied: percentage of projects with respect to other areas, beneficiary institutions, relationship with other disciplines, area and gender of main researchers, research topics, duration of projects, average funding, and degree of proximity to Library and Information Science. After commenting on the results obtained, a series of conclusions and proposals for improvement are established and future lines of research are presented. Resumen Se realiza un análisis de los proyectos concedidos en España dentro del Programa estatal de I+D+i orientado a los retos de la sociedad que centran su investigación en el campo de la Información y Documentación (IyD) durante el período 2012-2018. Identificados los proyectos se procede a estudiar las siguientes variables: porcentaje de proyectos respecto a otras áreas, instituciones beneficiarias, relación con otras disciplinas, área de conocimiento y género de los investigadores principales, temática de las investigaciones, duración de los proyectos, promedio de financiación, y grado de relación con la IyD. Tras el comentario de los resultados obtenidos se establecen una serie de conclusiones y propuestas de mejora y se exponen futuras líneas de investigación.

show abstract

Estudio de la <i>Revista Española de Documentación Científica</i>: análisis comparativo de los periodos 1989-1999 y 2000-2010

Cited by 8 publications

References 5 publications

Journal of Information Science: A gender-based bibliometric study (2015–2020)

Journal of Information Science: A gender-based bibliometric study (2015–2020)

Bibliometría de la colaboración e impacto de la Revista de Biología Tropical (Web of Science 2003-2012)

Análisis de los proyectos de investigación sobre Información y Documentación del Programa estatal de I+D+i orientada a los retos de la sociedad (2012-2018)

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About